Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] 3.6 branch now open only for 3.6.0 release critical fixes and doc updates!

2016-11-22 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, 2016-11-22 8:24 GMT+01:00 Ned Deily : > OK, all of the release engineering for 3.6.0b4 is complete. The 3.6 branch > in the cpython repo is now available again but, as noted, *only* for reviewed > release critical fixes appropriate for the 3.6.0 final and for final 3.6.0 > doc updates! So

[Python-Dev] Bus error in Python 3.6.0beta

2016-11-22 Thread Stefan Scherfke
Hi all, I am trying to build a custom Conda installer for Python 3.6.0b4. I could successfully build an run Python. However, when I run the generated Conda installer, it dies with a "Bus error". It happens when Conda's meta-installer script tries to replace the build-prefix (e.g., /home/stefan

Re: [Python-Dev] Bus error in Python 3.6.0beta

2016-11-22 Thread Stefan Scherfke
On 22.11.2016 12:52, Stefan Scherfke wrote: Here is a minimal example that reproduces the error: $ /tmp/py36/bin/python Python 3.6.0b4 (default, Nov 22 2016, 10:32:29) [GCC 6.2.1 20160916 (Red Hat 6.2.1-2)] on linux path = '/tmp/py36/lib/libpython3.6m.so.1.0' f = open(path, 'wb') BusError

Re: [Python-Dev] Bus error in Python 3.6.0beta

2016-11-22 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:52:59 +0100 Stefan Scherfke wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to build a custom Conda installer for Python 3.6.0b4. > > I could successfully build an run Python. However, when I run > the generated Conda installer, it dies with a "Bus error". > > It happens when Conda's m

Re: [Python-Dev] Bus error in Python 3.6.0beta

2016-11-22 Thread INADA Naoki
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Stefan Scherfke wrote: > > > On 22.11.2016 12:52, Stefan Scherfke wrote: >> >> >> Here is a minimal example that reproduces the error: >> >> $ /tmp/py36/bin/python >> Python 3.6.0b4 (default, Nov 22 2016, 10:32:29) >> [GCC 6.2.1 20160916 (Red Hat 6.2.1-2)] on linux

Re: [Python-Dev] Bus error in Python 3.6.0beta

2016-11-22 Thread Ned Deily
On Nov 22, 2016, at 06:52, Stefan Scherfke wrote: > /tmp/py36/bin/python In addition to the other comments, I'd check whether the new python is built with --enable-shared. If so, it's probably not a good idea to be writing to its library while running whereas, if it's not a shared build, it m

Re: [Python-Dev] Bus error in Python 3.6.0beta

2016-11-22 Thread Victor Stinner
It's not bug but a feature :-) Python doesn't protect yourself against mistakes :-) Victor ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-

Re: [Python-Dev] Bus error in Python 3.6.0beta

2016-11-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > It's not bug but a feature :-) Python doesn't protect yourself against > mistakes :-) AIUI the normal way to protect yourself is to unlink (remove) the file and create it from scratch, rather than truncate it. ChrisA __

[Python-Dev] Python 3.6.0 download stats

2016-11-22 Thread Steve Dower
For anyone who's interested, I ran a quick analysis of the download stats from python.org for CPython 3.6.0 releases since September. As Mac and Linux users typically get their downloads from elsewhere, those stats are on the low side. However, we've been getting roughly 10k downloads/day for

Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] 3.6 branch now open only for 3.6.0 release critical fixes and doc updates!

2016-11-22 Thread Raymond Hettinger
> On Nov 22, 2016, at 6:57 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > > Should I revert these changes? I don't think reverting any of these would improve the release. I vote for them to stay. Raymond ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://

Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] 3.6 branch now open only for 3.6.0 release critical fixes and doc updates!

2016-11-22 Thread Victor Stinner
Ok, thank you Raymond for checking. Victor Le 23 nov. 2016 05:25, "Raymond Hettinger" a écrit : > > > On Nov 22, 2016, at 6:57 AM, Victor Stinner > wrote: > > > > Should I revert these changes? > > I don't think reverting any of these would improve the release. > I vote for them to stay. > > >