On 05.11.2016 10:56, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hi Victor,
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 13:53:10 +0100
Victor Stinner wrote:
Raw results of Python 3.6 compared to Python 2.7:
That's interesting, but I would be personally more interested in
a performance comparison of 3.5 and 3.6, to know if anything
inte
Re:
https://speed.python.org/timeline/#/?exe=4&ben=python_startup&env=1&revs=50&equid=off&quarts=on&extr=on
That's suspiciously close to the core sprint. Since the -S time stayed
roughly the same I suspect that either a new module was added to the
startup sequence or one of the (too many) modules
Hi all
Those of you who follow me on Twitter (@zooba) may have noticed that I
posted one of my rare blog posts over the weekend about the increasing
range of Python installers available for Windows.
I figured I'd draw some attention here in case others are interested in
my rationale for why
2016-11-07 20:20 GMT+01:00 Guido van Rossum :
> Re:
> https://speed.python.org/timeline/#/?exe=4&ben=python_startup&env=1&revs=50&equid=off&quarts=on&extr=on
>
> That's suspiciously close to the core sprint. Since the -S time stayed
> roughly the same I suspect that either a new module was added to
Hi,
Antoine Pitrou asked me to compare Python 3.6 to Python 3.5. Here are
results on the speed-python server using LTO compilation (but not
PGO):
$ python3 -m perf compare_to 2016-11-03_15-37-3.5-89f7386104e2.json
2016-11-03_15-38-3.6-c4319c0d0131.json -G --min-speed=5
Slower (17):
- call_method_
