On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
>
>> On Sep 10, 2015, at 3:23 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>
>> I would like to know what are the semantics if you subclass something
>> from itertools (e.g. islice).
>>
>> Right now it's allowed and people do it, which is why the
>> doc
In a message of Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:49:12 -0400, Terry Reedy writes:
>and, if we are stuck with <-intransitivity, what do we do? If
>back-compatibility allowed, I might suggest defining 'lt' or 'less'
>rather than '__lt__' so that sort and bisect don't work with DateTimes.
>Then document that th
Hi,
had some time to test the new distributed stuff for Windows
especially the embeddable zip.
Thanks for this special distribution, it is very useful to generate
standalone Python distributions and software based on Python.
Very good work.
I detected two minor issues only affecting size, opened
On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.5 release
team, I'm proud to announce the availability of Python 3.5.0. Python
3.5.0 is the newest version of the Python language, and it contains many
exciting new features and optimizations.
You can read all about what's new
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:49:12 -0400, Terry Reedy writes:
>>and, if we are stuck with <-intransitivity, what do we do? If
>>back-compatibility allowed, I might suggest defining 'lt' or 'less'
>>rather than '__lt__' so that sort a
[Chris Angelico ]
> What I'd like to hear (but maybe this won't be possible) would be
> "less-than is transitive if and only if ", where might be
> something like "all of the datetimes are in the same timezone" or
> "none of the datetimes fall within a fold" or something. That would at
> least mak
> On Sep 13, 2015, at 3:49 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>
>> The intended semantics are that the itertools are classes (not functions
>> and not generators). They are intended to be sub-classable (that is
>> why they have Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE defined).
>
> Ok, so what's completely missing from
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Tim Peters wrote:
> That's a sane & easy sufficient condition. It's a waste of time to
> worry about minimal necessary conditions. "Convert to UTC' is the
> obvious way to do darned near everything. Converting to any other
> fixed-offset zone would do just as we
On Sep 12, 2015, at 03:54 PM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
>This Informational PEP collects information about git. There is, of course, a
>lot of documentation for git, so the PEP concentrates on more complex (and
>more related to Python development) issues, scenarios and examples.
Thanks for this Oleg.
Hello!
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 02:10:42PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> One of the things I think is missing from most git documentation, is an
> effective workflow for handling multiple branches.
Thank you for the good question! I doubt there One True Way, so the
core team will choose one of
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
>
>> On Sep 13, 2015, at 3:49 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>
>>> The intended semantics are that the itertools are classes (not functions
>>> and not generators). They are intended to be sub-classable (that is
>>> why they have Py_TPFLA
Thanks for the kind words, glad you're finding the distribution useful.
Feel free to assign me (steve.dower) to the issues. I assume they're referring
to the contents of the library.zip file? In which case, you're correct, those
are unnecessary. I'll take a closer look when I'm at my PC.
Cheers
webmaster has already heard from 4 people who cannot install it.
I sent them to the bug tracker or to python-list but they seem
not to have gone either place. Is there some guide I should be
sending them to, 'how to debug installation problems'?
Laura
I could not fine '3.4.4' either in
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0429/ 3.4 schedule
or elsewhere on the site.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
h
> On Sep 13, 2015, at 3:09 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>
> Well, fair enough, but the semantics of "whatever happens to happen
> because we decided subclassing is a cool idea" is possibly the worst
> answer to those questions.
It's hard to read this in any way that isn't insulting.
It was su
Hey all,
I just wanted to clarify, that I am very excited about a few ideas I have
--- but I don't have time myself to engage in the community process to get
these changes into NumPy. However, those are real processes --- I've
been coaching a few people in those processes for the past several
It's not. My thinking was, do it in about a month. How's that sound?
3.4.4 should be the last bugfix release of 3.4, after that it'll move
into security-fixes-only.
//arry/
On 09/13/2015 11:05 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
I could not fine '3.4.4' either in
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-
Hey Raymond
I'm sorry you got insulted, that was not my intention. I suppose
something like "itertools objects are implemented as classes
internally, which means they're subclassable like other builtin types"
is an improvement to documentation.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Raymond Hettinger
18 matches
Mail list logo
