On 17 March 2015 at 23:49, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:11 PM Neil Girdhar wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I was wondering what is left with the PEP 448
>> (http://bugs.python.org/issue2292) code review? Big thanks to Benjamin,
>> Ethan, and Serhiy for reviewing some (all?
On 18 March 2015 at 06:41, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 16/03/2015 12:38, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>
>
> Can you use anything from the meta issue http://bugs.python.org/issue15787
> for PEP 3121 and PEP 384 or will the work that you are doing render
> everything done previously redundant?
N
We're starting a discussion in Fedora about setting the default shbang for
system python executables and/or daemons to python -s or python -Es (or ?).
See also:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202151
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/513
Basically we're wanting to avoid locally in
On Mar 18, 2015, at 03:46 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>We're starting a discussion in Fedora about setting the default shbang for
>system python executables and/or daemons to python -s or python -Es (or ?).
We've talked about this in Debian/Ubuntu land and the general consensus is
that for Python
2015-03-18 16:46 GMT+01:00 Orion Poplawski :
> We're starting a discussion in Fedora about setting the default shbang for
> system python executables and/or daemons to python -s or python -Es (or ?).
Python 3.4 has -I which is more strict than -Es.
It remembers me "Perl suid", /usr/bin/sperl. May
On Mar 18, 2015, at 05:31 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>Does it work to pass command line options to Python in the shebang?
Yes, but only one "word", thus -Es or -I.
We've often mused about whether it makes sense to have two Pythons on the
system. One for system scripts and another for users. Sys
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:22:03PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 03:46 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> >We're starting a discussion in Fedora about setting the default shbang for
> >system python executables and/or daemons to python -s or python -Es (or ?).
>
> We've talked abou
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 05:31 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
>> Does it work to pass command line options to Python in the shebang?
>
> Yes, but only one "word", thus -Es or -I.
>
> We've often mused about whether it makes sense to have two Pyt
On Mar 18, 2015, at 02:44 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>Interesting, I've cautiously in favor of -s in Fedora but the more I've
>thought about it the less I've liked -E. It just seems like PYTHONPATH is
>analagous to LD_LIBRARY_PATH for C programs and PATH for shell scripting.
>We leave both of tho
On Mar 18, 2015, at 05:51 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>I’ve long wished that the OS had it’s own virtual environment. A lot of
>problems seems to come from trying to cram the things the OS wants with the
>things that the user wants into the same namespace.
Yep, and those breakages can be difficult t
10 matches
Mail list logo
