On 03/14/2015 11:46 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> In general, it would seem to me that each version of Python could add object
> types that are foreign to prior versions,
> and so as long as version N can unpickle anything produced by versions <=N,
> all would be well.
The question to me is beca
On 15.03.15 07:52, Ethan Furman wrote:
So how do we fix it? There are a couple different options:
- modify IntEnum pickle methods to return the name only
- modify IntEnum pickle methods to pickle just like the int they represent
The first option has the advantage that in 3.4 and above,
Bringing back on list. :)
On 03/15/2015 12:18 AM, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> On 3/14/2015 11:58 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> On 03/14/2015 11:46 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote:
>>
>>> In general, it would seem to me that each version of Python could
>>> add object types that are foreign to prior versions,
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:52:17 -0700
Ethan Furman wrote:
> I'm not sure exactly how to phrase this inquiry, so please bear with me.
>
> What exactly does backwards compatibility mean as far as pickle goes? We
> have the various protocols, we have the
> contents of pickle files created at those p
Huzzah! Thanks for working on this one folks, it should make the zipfile
execution support much easier for current and future Python users to
discover :)
Cheers,
Nick.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/list
