Hi,
> I, too, was thinking /24. I think that overflowing the host portion
> should raise OverflowError.
>
Just curiosity, why not a modulo calculation on the subnet instead
of raising the error?
Thanks in advance!
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Py
Hi
>
> It might be a matter of taste, but I don't find declaring C functions
> any more awkward than using strange interface that ctypes comes with.
> the equivalent in cffi would be ffi.cast("double (*)()", x)
- Could you please elaborate on "using strange interface"?
- Is there an easy way to c
On 03/11/2015 06:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 4:49 PM Jim J. Jewett wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014, at 14:13, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>> ... http://bugs.python.org/issue23085 ...
>>> is there any reason any more for libffi being included in CPython?
>>
>>
>> Pau
On 3/14/2015 7:04 AM, francis wrote:
> Hi,
>> I, too, was thinking /24. I think that overflowing the host portion
>> should raise OverflowError.
>>
> Just curiosity, why not a modulo calculation on the subnet instead
> of raising the error?
Personally, I can't imaging wanting that behavior. I can'
On 3/14/2015 4:52 PM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
> On 3/14/2015 7:04 AM, francis wrote:
>> Hi,
>>> I, too, was thinking /24. I think that overflowing the host portion
>>> should raise OverflowError.
>>>
>> Just curiosity, why not a modulo calculation on the subnet instead
>> of raising the error?
>
> Pe
I always intended all my releases to be on Sundays--that all the release
engineering work is done on weekends, which is generally easier for
everybody. But I goofed up the 3.5 release schedule and had proposed
3.5.0a3 to be released Saturday March 28th. With the assent of the team
I bumped
Eric V. Smith writes:
> Personally, I can't imaging wanting that behavior. I can't say I've ever
> needed additional at all with an IP address, but if I did, it would only
> be to stay within the host portion. To wrap around seems odd.
It's worse than odd. I've occasionally had use for iterat
I'm not sure exactly how to phrase this inquiry, so please bear with me.
What exactly does backwards compatibility mean as far as pickle goes? We have
the various protocols, we have the
contents of pickle files created at those protocols, and we have different
versions of Python.
Should a pick
[1] The second option hasn't been coded yet, but the first one has.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.py
On 3/14/2015 10:52 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
I'm not sure exactly how to phrase this inquiry, so please bear with me.
What exactly does backwards compatibility mean as far as pickle goes? We have
the various protocols, we have the
contents of pickle files created at those protocols, and we have
10 matches
Mail list logo
