It's worth noting that as far as I am aware, all the cases where CPython
currently raises TypeError directly rather than returning NotImplemented
are due to a longstanding bug in the handling concatenation and repetition
of sequences implemented entirely in C (which includes the builtins):
http://b
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014, at 09:55, antoine.pitrou wrote:
> https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/eba6e68e818c
> changeset: 93382:eba6e68e818c
> branch: 2.7
> parent: 93379:e54d0b197c82
> user:Antoine Pitrou
> date:Tue Nov 04 14:52:10 2014 +0100
> summary:
> Issue #22773: fi
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 09:58:29 -0400
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014, at 09:55, antoine.pitrou wrote:
> > https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/eba6e68e818c
> > changeset: 93382:eba6e68e818c
> > branch: 2.7
> > parent: 93379:e54d0b197c82
> > user:Antoine Pitrou
> >
Hi folks,
I am trying to replace dinamically the __call__ method of an object using
setattr.
Example:
$ cat testcall.py
class A:
def __init__(self):
setattr(self, '__call__', self.newcall)
def __call__(self):
print("OLD")
def newcall(self):
print("NEW")
a=A(
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Roberto Martínez
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am trying to replace dinamically the __call__ method of an object using
> setattr.
> Example:
>
> $ cat testcall.py
> class A:
> def __init__(self):
> setattr(self, '__call__', self.newcall)
>
> def __call__(
This list is for the development _of_ Python, not development _with_ Python.
Try asking on Python List.
(forwarding...)
On 11/04/2014 08:52 AM, Roberto Martínez wrote:
I am trying to replace dinamically the __call__ method of an object using
setattr.
Example:
$ cat testcall.py
class A:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Roberto Martínez <
robertomartin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> $ cat testcall.py
> class A:
>
You are using old-style classes in Python 2.7 unless you explicitly inherit
from object. If I vary the class line to be "class A(object):" I get the
same behavior with 2.7 as yo
