On Fri Apr 18 2014 at 5:03:33 PM, Ezio Melotti
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu Apr 17 2014 at 1:34:23 PM, Jurko Gospodnetić
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi.
> >>
> >> On 14.4.2014. 23:51, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >> > Now the question is whether
Hello!
This approach worked for Nikolaus and I hope that it could work for me.
I have a couple of languishing patches, waiting for a core dev
to review, reject or commit them. I consider them ready to go,
but another pair of eyes could unveil unknown problems to me.
I pinged some issues from this
On 4/23/2014 3:27 PM, Claudiu Popa wrote:
* http://bugs.python.org/issue16104
`Use multiprocessing in compileall script`
This patch adds a new command line argument to `compileall`, also
a new argument to `compileall.compile_dir`, which controls the number
of worker processes used to compile a
On April 23, 2014 5:24:53 PM CDT, Terry Reedy wrote:
>On 4/23/2014 11:05 AM, zach.ware wrote:
>> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/75419257fec3
>> changeset: 90440:75419257fec3
>> branch: 3.4
>> parent: 90437:5d745d97b7da
>> user:Zachary Ware
>> date:Wed Apr 23 10:04:
Command line:
./python -m test.regrtest -v -R3:3 test_tools
Results:
Ran 44 tests in 7.628s
OK (skipped=1)
.
test_tools leaked [0, 2, 2] references, sum=4
1 test failed:
test_tools
Any words of wisdom for tracking those leaks?
--
~Ethan~
On Apr 17, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Think of tuples like a struct in C, lists like an array.
I generally agree but it’s a bit more complex, for instance when you have a
homogenous sequence but want it to be hashable. I just hit that today and felt
a little bad using tuple becau
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014, at 19:14, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Command line:
>
>./python -m test.regrtest -v -R3:3 test_tools
>
> Results:
>
>Ran 44 tests in 7.628s
>
>OK (skipped=1)
>.
>test_tools leaked [0, 2, 2] references, sum=4
>1 test failed:
>test_tools
>
> Any wo
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Łukasz Langa wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> Think of tuples like a struct in C, lists like an array.
>
>
> I generally agree but it’s a bit more complex, for instance when you have a
> homogenous sequence but want it to be hashable