[Python-Dev] Removing doc from pythonhosted.org

2014-03-01 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
I'm not sure whether this is the right mailing list where to post this. However, it seems the pypi UI currently provides a way to upload doc at the bottom of the page https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit&name=PROJECT_NAME but there's currently no way to remove it: https://bitbucket.org/p

[Python-Dev] Wave module support for floating point data

2014-03-01 Thread Sebastian Kraft
Hi everybody, more than a year ago I have submitted a patch to enhance the Wave module with read/write support for floating point data. http://bugs.python.org/issue16525 Up till now this patch has not been applied nor did I get feedback if anything needs to be enhanced or changed before it c

Re: [Python-Dev] Wave module support for floating point data

2014-03-01 Thread Terry Reedy
On 3/1/2014 2:57 PM, Sebastian Kraft wrote: Hi everybody, more than a year ago I have submitted a patch to enhance the Wave module with read/write support for floating point data. http://bugs.python.org/issue16525 Up till now this patch has not been applied nor did I get feedback if anything n

Re: [Python-Dev] Wave module support for floating point data

2014-03-01 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 15:08:00 -0500 Terry Reedy wrote: > On 3/1/2014 2:57 PM, Sebastian Kraft wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > more than a year ago I have submitted a patch to enhance the Wave module > > with read/write support for floating point data. > > > > http://bugs.python.org/issue16525 > >

Re: [Python-Dev] Wave module support for floating point data

2014-03-01 Thread Terry Reedy
On 3/1/2014 3:25 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 15:08:00 -0500 Terry Reedy wrote: On 3/1/2014 2:57 PM, Sebastian Kraft wrote: Hi everybody, more than a year ago I have submitted a patch to enhance the Wave module with read/write support for floating point data. http://bugs.pyt

[Python-Dev] "Five reviews to get yours reviewed"?

2014-03-01 Thread Chris Angelico
Way back in 2012, Martin Löwis declared a standing offer on this list to get issue patches reviewed: review five issues and he'll review one of yours. [1] Is that offer still around? Have any other devs made any similar offer? I have a couple of patches outstanding, notably issue 20249 [2], which

Re: [Python-Dev] "Five reviews to get yours reviewed"?

2014-03-01 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > I have a couple of patches outstanding, notably issue 20249 [2], which > is a small change, has a patch, and has no activity or nosying since > its creation. And Benjamin Peterson has just looked into this one and committed it, not three mi

Re: [Python-Dev] "Five reviews to get yours reviewed"?

2014-03-01 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:11:01 +1100 Chris Angelico wrote: > More importantly, if there is such an offer, it'd be great to mention > it somewhere, so people can know what they can do to move an issue > forward. (And preferably with a link somewhere to what it means to > review a patch - what it takes

Re: [Python-Dev] "Five reviews to get yours reviewed"?

2014-03-01 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:11:01 +1100 > Chris Angelico wrote: >> More importantly, if there is such an offer, it'd be great to mention >> it somewhere, so people can know what they can do to move an issue >> forward. (And preferably with a link

Re: [Python-Dev] "Five reviews to get yours reviewed"?

2014-03-01 Thread Terry Reedy
On 3/1/2014 7:11 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: Way back in 2012, Martin Löwis declared a standing offer on this list to get issue patches reviewed: review five issues and he'll review one of yours. As I remember, he set a pretty low bar for 'review', lowing that I think you are thinking. I have

Re: [Python-Dev] "Five reviews to get yours reviewed"?

2014-03-01 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 3/1/2014 7:11 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> I have a couple of patches outstanding, notably issue 20249 [2], which >> is a small change, has a patch, and has no activity or nosying since >> its creation. > > And the other? http://bugs.python.