On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
> On 13 Jul 2013, at 07:41, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> > On 7/13/2013 12:10 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
> >>
> >> On Feb 27, 2013 4:31 AM, "Michael Foord" >
> >> > +1 PLY is capable and well tried-and-tested. We used it in Resolver
> >> One to impleme
I'm in favor of PLY going into stdlib with the caveat that there are some
things about it that should probably be cleaned up and modernized. For
instance, the method by which it writes the cached parsing tables needs to be
cleaned up. I still think putting the LALR(1) generator code into a co
On 13 July 2013 23:26, David Beazley wrote:
> I'm in favor of PLY going into stdlib with the caveat that there are some
> things about it that should probably be cleaned up and modernized. For
> instance, the method by which it writes the cached parsing tables needs to
> be cleaned up. I still
