On 05/20/2013 05:15 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
1) Do nothing and be happy I use 'raise ... from None' in my own libraries
2) Change the wording of 'During handling of the above exception, another
exception occurred' (no ideas as to what at
the moment)
The word "occurred" misleads one to think
21.05.13 10:17, Hrvoje Niksic написав(ла):
On 05/20/2013 05:15 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
1) Do nothing and be happy I use 'raise ... from None' in my own
libraries
2) Change the wording of 'During handling of the above exception,
another exception occurred' (no ideas as to what at
the moment)
On 05/21/2013 10:36 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
The above exception was converted to the following exception:
...
That makes it clear that the conversion was explicit and (hopefully)
intentional, and that the latter exception supersedes the former.
How do you distinguish intentional
On 5/20/2013 11:44 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote:
On 5/14/2013 7:16 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Thank you for being persistent. You are correct, the value should
be an IntET (at least, with a custom __new__ ;).
You know, when you look at something you wrote the night before, and
have no idea what yo
21.05.13 12:28, Hrvoje Niksic написав(ла):
On 05/21/2013 10:36 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
The above exception was converted to the following exception:
...
That makes it clear that the conversion was explicit and (hopefully)
intentional, and that the latter exception supersedes the f
On 05/21/2013 11:56 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
try:
x = d['key']
except KeyError:
x = fallback('key')
def fallback(key):
if key not in a:
raise BusinessError(...)
return 1 / a[key] # possible TypeError, ZeroDivisionError, etc
Yes, in that case the exception w
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> On 05/20/2013 05:15 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>>
>> 1) Do nothing and be happy I use 'raise ... from None' in my own
>> libraries
>>
>> 2) Change the wording of 'During handling of the above exception, another
>> exception occurred' (no ideas
21.05.13 13:05, Hrvoje Niksic написав(ла):
On 05/21/2013 11:56 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
try:
x = d['key']
except KeyError:
x = fallback('key')
def fallback(key):
if key not in a:
raise BusinessError(...)
return 1 / a[key] # possible TypeError, ZeroDivisionEr
On 20 maj 2013, at 03:46, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
>> Now you've got me wondering what Python would be like if repr, `` and
>> __repr__ never existed as language features. Upon first thoughts, I actually
>> don't see much downside (no, i'
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:35 AM, r.david.murray
wrote:
Yay for having this in the FAQ, but...
> +If you wrote::
> +
> + >>> a_tuple = (1, 2)
> + >>> a_tuple[0] += 1
> + Traceback (most recent call last):
> + ...
> + TypeError: 'tuple' object does not support item assignment
> +
> +
On 05/21/2013 02:57 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
21.05.13 13:05, Hrvoje Niksic написав(ла):
On 05/21/2013 11:56 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
try:
x = d['key']
except KeyError:
x = fallback('key')
def fallback(key):
if key not in a:
raise BusinessError(...)
retur
Actually changing __str__ or __repr__ is out of the question, best we can
do is discourage makingbthem different. But adding a protocol for pprint
(with extra parameters to convey options) is a fair idea. I note that Nick
sggested to use single-dispatch generic functions for this though. Both
have
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> In my example code the "raise" keyword appears lexically inside the "except"
> clause. The compiler would automatically emit a different raise opcode in
> that case.
Hrvoje, can we drop this subthread please. The topic was addressed way
ba
On Tue, 21 May 2013 01:39:03 +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On 21/05/13 00:12, Ethan Furman wrote:
>
> > As a case in point, base64.py is currently getting a bug fix, and also
> > contains this code:
> >
> > def b32decode(s, casefold=False, map01=None):
> > .
> > .
> > .
> >
Hello,
I would like to nominate Benjamin as BDFL-Delegate for PEP 442.
Please tell me if you would like to object :)
Regards
Antoine.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
2013/5/21 Antoine Pitrou :
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to nominate Benjamin as BDFL-Delegate for PEP 442.
> Please tell me if you would like to object :)
I think he's a scoundrel.
--
Regards,
Benjamin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
No objections. Benjamin, don't accept it until we've had a chance to
talk this over in person. I think we'll see a lot of each other
starting next week... :-)
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2013/5/21 Antoine Pitrou :
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to nominate Benjami
On 05/21/2013 04:23 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
On 05/20/2013 05:15 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
1) Do nothing and be happy I use 'raise ... from None' in my own
libraries
2) Change the wording of 'During handling of the above exception, another
Hi,
I am posting this here since I could find no active maintainer of the smtpd
module.
In my work as a test engineer for Axis (www.axis.com) I encountered the need of
having thread-safe SMTP servers. I know the use case of several SMTP servers
running in concurrent threads might seem odd, but
On Tue, 21 May 2013 18:50:23 +0200, Sorin Stelian
wrote:
> I am posting this here since I could find no active maintainer of the smtpd
> module.
Currently I am effectively the maintainer of that module, though other
people are helping out.
> In my work as a test engineer for Axis (www.axis.com
Łukasz Langa wrote:
1. Make __str__() a protocol for arbitrary string conversion.
2. Move the current __repr__() contracts, both firm and informal to a
new, extensible version of pprint.
-1. The purposes of repr() and pprint() are quite different.
Please let's not make any sweeping changes ab
On 5/20/13, Mark Janssen wrote:
>>> * Doctests practically beg you to write your code first and then copy
>>> and
>>> paste terminal sessions - they're the enemy of TDD
>>
>> Of course , not , all the opposite . If the approach is understood
>> correctly then the first thing test author will do is
22 matches
Mail list logo
