Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7 series.
I hope it's not (and in the IDLE thread you say so otherwise too).
Matthias
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
ht
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
>> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7 series.
>
> I hope it's not (and in the IDLE thread you say so otherwise too).
It most certainly will be the latest once it's
2013/3/26 Lennart Regebro :
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
>>> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7 series.
>>
>> I hope it's not (and in the IDLE thread you say so otherwise too).
>
> It most c
It's already hard to sell 2.7 in most companies.
Regards,
Antonio
Anyway, you should trust Brett Canon: "Python 3.3: Trust Me, It's
Better Than Python 2.7".
https://speakerdeck.com/pyconslides/python-3-dot-3-trust-me-its-better-than-python-2-dot-7-by-dr-brett-cannon
Victor
2013/3/26 Matthias Klose :
> Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
>> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7 series.
>
> I hope it's not (and in the IDLE thread you say so otherwise too).
"latest" is different from "last" :)
--
Regards,
Benjamin
___
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:16:47 -0700, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> If you're editing with Emacs, it is really easy to reflow paragraphs
> and to insert or remove multiline comments each prefixed with #.
> But with other editors, it can be a PITA and a multiline string is
> the easiest to maintain and
Le Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:34:34 +0100,
Victor Stinner a écrit :
> 2013/3/26 Lennart Regebro :
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Matthias Klose
> > wrote:
> >> Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
> >>> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7
> >>> series.
> >>
Le Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:28:51 -0400,
"R. David Murray" a écrit :
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:16:47 -0700, Raymond Hettinger
> wrote:
> > If you're editing with Emacs, it is really easy to reflow paragraphs
> > and to insert or remove multiline comments each prefixed with #.
> > But with other editors
On 03/25/2013 02:16 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I just realized that the Python peephole optimizer removes useless
instructions like numbers and strings between other instructions,
without raising an error nor emiting an error. Example:
$ python -Wd -c 'print "Hello"; "World"'
Hello
As part
And I still think it's neat. :-)
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 02:16 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just realized that the Python peephole optimizer removes useless
>> instructions like numbers and strings between other instructions,
>> without
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:53:39 +0100 (CET)
christian.heimes wrote:
> +
> +The XML processing modules are not secure against maliciously constructed
> data.
> +An attacker can abuse vulnerabilities for e.g. denial of service attacks, to
> +access local files, to generate network connections to other
On Mar 26, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:53:39 +0100 (CET)
> christian.heimes wrote:
>> +
>> +The XML processing modules are not secure against maliciously constructed
>> data.
>> +An attacker can abuse vulnerabilities for e.g. denial of service attacks, to
>
Am 26.03.2013 19:41, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:53:39 +0100 (CET)
> christian.heimes wrote:
>> +
>> +The XML processing modules are not secure against maliciously constructed
>> data.
>> +An attacker can abuse vulnerabilities for e.g. denial of service attacks, to
>> +access
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:54:11 +0100
a.cava...@cavallinux.eu wrote:
> It's already hard to sell 2.7 in most companies.
Sure, it's often hard to sell free software!
Regards
Antoine.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.or
Just an FYI that there are under 3 days to apply to Google Summer of
Code for mentoring organizations:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013. The
student application deadline is later on in May.
If you run a project that is interested in applying under the Python
umbrella org
Am 26.03.2013 13:13, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
> 2013/3/26 Matthias Klose :
>> Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
>>> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7 series.
>>
>> I hope it's not (and in the IDLE thread you say so otherwise too).
>
> "latest" is differ
Hi,
I made progress since last August on my astoptimizer project (read the
Changelog). Previous email thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-August/121286.html
The astoptimizer project is an optimizer rewriting Python AST. It
executes as much code as possible during the compilat
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Anyway, you should trust Brett Canon: "Python 3.3: Trust Me, It's
> Better Than Python 2.7".
>
> https://speakerdeck.com/pyconslides/python-3-dot-3-trust-me-its-better-than-python-2-dot-7-by-dr-brett-cannon
Was there supposed to be audio wi
Am 26.03.2013 um 23:05 schrieb Sean Felipe Wolfe :
>> Anyway, you should trust Brett Canon: "Python 3.3: Trust Me, It's
>> Better Than Python 2.7".
>>
>> https://speakerdeck.com/pyconslides/python-3-dot-3-trust-me-its-better-than-python-2-dot-7-by-dr-brett-cannon
> Was there supposed to be audio
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
> Speakerdeck is slides only. The video is here:
> http://pyvideo.org/video/1730/python-33-trust-me-its-better-than-27
Sweet thanks!
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.p
Hey everybody how are you all :)
I am an intermediate-level python coder looking to get help out. I've
been reading over the dev guide about helping increase test coverage
-->
http://docs.python.org/devguide/coverage.html
And also the third-party code coverage referenced in the devguide page:
htt
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Sean Felipe Wolfe wrote:
> Hey everybody how are you all :)
>
> I am an intermediate-level python coder looking to get help out. I've
> been reading over the dev guide about helping increase test coverage
> -->
> http://docs.python.org/devguide/coverage.html
>
> An
[asked on comp.lang.python but no takers. So I'm bumping it up a notch.]
I have ported my Python debugger pydbgr to Python3. See [1] or [2].
Inside the debugger, when there is an exec() somewhere in the call stack,
I'd like to be able to retrieve the string parameter. With this, the
debugger can
2013/3/26 Rocky Bernstein :
> [asked on comp.lang.python but no takers. So I'm bumping it up a notch.]
>
> I have ported my Python debugger pydbgr to Python3. See [1] or [2].
>
> Inside the debugger, when there is an exec() somewhere in the call stack,
> I'd like to be able to retrieve the string p
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:59:06 -0700, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Sean Felipe Wolfe
> wrote:
> > Hey everybody how are you all :)
> >
> > I am an intermediate-level python coder looking to get help out. I've
> > been reading over the dev guide about helping increas
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2013/3/26 Rocky Bernstein :
> > [asked on comp.lang.python but no takers. So I'm bumping it up a notch.]
> >
> > I have ported my Python debugger pydbgr to Python3. See [1] or [2].
> >
> > Inside the debugger, when there is an exec() som
26 matches
Mail list logo
