This is getting off-topic, but:
CancelIoEx() is a new api that I wasn't aware of (my IOCP solution dates back
to 2005). It appears that this can be used, although the documentation is
sketchy.
This worries me:
"If the file handle is associated with a completion port, an I/O completion
packet is
Yes, well, as a matter of fact, I do have an IOCP based socket implementation
with stackless python.
>From the programmer's perspective, operations appear blocking while IOCP is
>used to switch tasklets in the background.
But my socket timeout implementation does not guarantee that the socket is
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:24:10AM -0700, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
> Is it still up to date? Bug has been created in 2004.
> I don't see Tru64 in list of available buildbots.
>
> Do we need to care about this platform? And how to make sure what
> existing code works fine for that?
There's a Snak
On 27/11/2012 9:35am, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
This worries me:
"If the file handle is associated with a completion port, an I/O completion
> packet is not queued to the port if a synchronous operation is
successfully canceled...
I think you can only abort a synchronous operation if you u
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Kristján Valur Jónsson
wrote:
> Yes, well, as a matter of fact, I do have an IOCP based socket implementation
> with stackless python.
It would have been nice if you had given more context and stated your
objective upfront instead of asking what appeared to be an
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Along with a number of other free and open communities, Python is
> being included in a survey of new contributors since January 2010. The
> survey is being done by Kevin Carillo, a PhD student at Victoria
> University of Wellingto
The hackiest part of my WSAPoll patch is this:
--- a/PC/pyconfig.h Sun Nov 18 10:42:42 2012 +
+++ b/PC/pyconfig.h Sun Nov 18 17:27:29 2012 -0500
@@ -158,12 +158,12 @@
/* set the version macros for the windows headers */
#ifdef MS_WINX64
/* 64 bit only runs on XP or greater */
-#
Am 27.11.2012 23:49, schrieb Trent Nelson:
> I don't think we've currently got the ability to do this, right?
> Is there a precedent set anywhere else? I suspect it's not as
> much of an issue on *NIX platforms as you'll typically compile
> from source. Windows, not so much.
>
>
On 27/11/2012 10:49pm, Trent Nelson wrote:
Ideally, a Windows binary should make WSAPoll/select.poll()
available if running on Vista or above, without impacting
the ability to run on XP.
I assume you can do something like
int WSAAPI (*pWSAPoll)(WSAPOLLFD *, ULONG, INT);
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:09:12PM -0800, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 27.11.2012 23:49, schrieb Trent Nelson:
> > I don't think we've currently got the ability to do this, right?
> > Is there a precedent set anywhere else? I suspect it's not as
> > much of an issue on *NIX platforms as
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:14:00PM -0800, Richard Oudkerk wrote:
> On 27/11/2012 10:49pm, Trent Nelson wrote:
> > Ideally, a Windows binary should make WSAPoll/select.poll()
> > available if running on Vista or above, without impacting
> > the ability to run on XP.
>
> I assume you
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Kristján Valur Jónsson
> wrote:
>>
>> Where in the tracker? I tried searching but didn’t find it.
>
>
> This one: http://bugs.python.org/issue13475
>
> This and the issue about being able to configure coverag
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Kristján Valur Jónsson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Where in the tracker? I tried searching but didn’t find it.
>>
>>
>> This one: http://bugs.python.org/issue13475
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Trent Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:09:12PM -0800, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Am 27.11.2012 23:49, schrieb Trent Nelson:
> > > I don't think we've currently got the ability to do this, right?
> > > Is there a precedent set anywhere else? I sus
Am 28.11.2012 06:37, schrieb Gregory P. Smith:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Trent Nelson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:09:12PM -0800, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Am 27.11.2012 23:49, schrieb Trent Nelson:
I don't think we've currently got the ability to do this, right?
15 matches
Mail list logo
