On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2012/1/21 gregory.p.smith :
> ...
>> +/* Convert ASCII to a positive int, no libc call. no overflow. -1 on error.
>> */
>
> Is no libc call important?
Yes. strtol() is not on the async signal safe C library function list.
>
>> +static
> This seed is chosen randomly at runtime, but cannot
> change once chosen.
The hash is used to compare objects: if hash(obj1) != hash(obj2),
objects are considered different. So two strings must have the same
hash if their value is the same.
> Salt could also be an appropriate term here, but sin
On 21 Jan 2012, at 20:24, Vijay Majagaonkar wrote:
>
> On 2012-01-21, at 1:57 PM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
>
>> Am Freitag, 20. Januar 2012 um 23:40 schrieb Vijay Majagaonkar:
> I am trying to build python 3 on mac and build failing with following
> error can somebody help me with this
>
Wiadomość napisana przez Michael Foord w dniu 22 sty 2012, o godz. 14:14:
> ./configure CC=gcc-4.2 --prefix=/dev/null --with-pydebug
Why the phony prefix?
--
Best regards,
Łukasz Langa
Senior Systems Architecture Engineer
IT Infrastructure Department
Grupa Allegro Sp. z o.o.
Pomyśl o śr
On 22 Jan 2012, at 17:43, Łukasz Langa wrote:
> Wiadomość napisana przez Michael Foord w dniu 22 sty 2012, o godz. 14:14:
>
>> ./configure CC=gcc-4.2 --prefix=/dev/null --with-pydebug
>
> Why the phony prefix?
Heh, it's what I've always done - I think copied from other developers.
The
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:11, Victor Stinner
wrote:
>> This seed is chosen randomly at runtime, but cannot
>> change once chosen.
>
> The hash is used to compare objects: if hash(obj1) != hash(obj2),
> objects are considered different. So two strings must have the same
> hash if their value is th
I think this thread is approaching the recursion limit.
Be careful not to blow the stack :)
Regards
Antoine.
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:53:41 +0100
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:11, Victor Stinner
> wrote:
> >> This seed is chosen randomly at runtime, but cannot
> >> change
> We may use a different salt per dictionary.
If we're willing to re-hash everything on a per-dictionary basis. That
doesn't seem reasonable given our existing usage.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 06:02, Paul McMillan wrote:
>> We may use a different salt per dictionary.
>
> If we're willing to re-hash everything on a per-dictionary basis. That
> doesn't seem reasonable given our existing usage.
Well, if we get crazy amounts of collisions, re-hashing with a new
salt
Lennart Regebro writes:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 06:02, Paul McMillan wrote:
> >> We may use a different salt per dictionary.
> >
> > If we're willing to re-hash everything on a per-dictionary basis. That
> > doesn't seem reasonable given our existing usage.
>
> Well, if we get crazy amou
On 23 January 2012 16:49, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 06:02, Paul McMillan wrote:
> >> We may use a different salt per dictionary.
> >
> > If we're willing to re-hash everything on a per-dictionary basis. That
> > doesn't seem reasonable given our existing usage.
>
> Well, i
11 matches
Mail list logo
