An unexpected error occurred during the processing
of your message. The tracker administrator is being
notified.
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: rep...@bugs.python.org
Delivered-To: roundup+trac...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za
Received: from mail.python.org (mail.python.org [82.94.164.166])
by ps
> Move PyUnicode_WCHAR_KIND outside PyUnicode_Kind enum
What's the rationale for that change? It's a valid kind value, after
all, and the C convention is that an enumeration lists all valid values
(else there wouldn't be a need for an enumeration in the first place).
Regards,
Martin
___
On 18/12/2011 20:34, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
Move PyUnicode_WCHAR_KIND outside PyUnicode_Kind enum
What's the rationale for that change? It's a valid kind value, after
all, and the C convention is that an enumeration lists all valid values
(else there wouldn't be a need for an enumeration i
Am 18.12.2011 20:45, schrieb Victor Stinner:
> On 18/12/2011 20:34, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>>Move PyUnicode_WCHAR_KIND outside PyUnicode_Kind enum
>>
>> What's the rationale for that change? It's a valid kind value, after
>> all, and the C convention is that an enumeration lists all valid va
On 18/12/2011 21:04, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
PyUnicode_KIND() only returns PyUnicode_1BYTE_KIND, PyUnicode_2BYTE_KIND
or PyUnicode_4BYTE_KIND. Outside unicodeobject.c, you are not supposed
to see PyUnicode_WCHAR_KIND.
Why do you say that? It can very well happen, assuming you call
PyUnicode_KI
Am 18.12.2011 21:16, schrieb Victor Stinner:
> On 18/12/2011 21:04, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> PyUnicode_KIND() only returns PyUnicode_1BYTE_KIND, PyUnicode_2BYTE_KIND
>>> or PyUnicode_4BYTE_KIND. Outside unicodeobject.c, you are not supposed
>>> to see PyUnicode_WCHAR_KIND.
>>
>> Why do you say
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:32:44 +
Mark Shannon wrote:
>
> > per-instance attributes, it just forces them all to keep resizing up,
> > even though individual instances would be small with the current dict.
> There is a cut-off point, at the moment it's quite unsophisticated about
> how it does t
Fernando Perez writes:
> Apology for the advertising,
If there's any apologizing to be done, it's on Anatoly's part. Your
post was short, to the point, information-packed, and should put a big
fat open-centered ideographic full stop period to this thread.
__
