(note: i'm not a python dev subscriber so please make sure you CC
me with any advice and i'm hoping this desperate plea for assistance
is at least enough on-point for this list that someone can help me
out. and, yes, this is rather verbose but i wanted to supply all of
the relevant details in
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:01:01 -0400 (EDT)
"Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
>
> this build process works just fine for everyone else on the planet
> but it fails for me because i'm doing something apparently no one else
> has tried -- i'm running a (hand-rolled) linux 3.x kernel on my build
> host and it
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-07-29 - 2011-08-05)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open2899 (+10)
closed 21579 (+32)
total 24478 (+42)
Open issues wit
On 31/07/2011 07:47, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
It's really nice for stub functions:
def foo(x):
...
I guess pass is too pass-é?
;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_
Why was the old test suite removed?
Even if everything is covered by the test file (and that isn't clear
from this checkin), I don't see anything wrong with a quick test that
doesn't require loading the whole testing apparatus. (I would have no
objection to including a comment saying that the maj
Hi Jim,
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 23:55, Jim Jewett wrote:
> Why was the old test suite removed?
>
> Even if everything is covered by the test file (and that isn't clear
> from this checkin), I don't see anything wrong with a quick test that
> doesn't require loading the whole testing apparatus. (I
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 17:55:33 -0400
Jim Jewett wrote:
> Why was the old test suite removed?
>
> Even if everything is covered by the test file (and that isn't clear
> from this checkin), I don't see anything wrong with a quick test that
> doesn't require loading the whole testing apparatus. (I wou
