It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
I believe you need to add MULE to it.) Is there some reason such messages
can't
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
s...@pobox.com wrote:
> It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
> challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
> use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
> I believe you ne
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:21:08PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
> s...@pobox.com wrote:
> > It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
> > challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
> > use VM within XEmacs
Antoine> Hmm, are you sure? Software (especially mail-reading software)
Antoine> that doesn't support utf-8 in 2011 should be considered
Antoine> extremely broken.
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would
> I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
> reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
> easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii symbols are used?
Eugene
___
On 27.03.2011 18:33, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:21:08PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
>> s...@pobox.com wrote:
>> > It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
>> > challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-b
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:33:04 +0100, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> In my experience it is very difficult to get a whole system
> configured, such that UTF-8 works reliably. In my case that would
> mean, I think, Linux, glibc, mutt, screen, elinks, and SecureCRT would
> all have to simultaneously be configure
Am 27.03.2011 17:06, schrieb s...@pobox.com:
> It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
> challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
> use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
> I believe you need to add MU
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:13:29PM -0400, Eugene Toder wrote:
> > I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
> > reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
> > easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
>
> Isn't utf-8 itself sa
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:21:25PM -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
> > Mind you, I've never managed to get the <-- button working reliably
> > either, but to be fair that's insanely complicated too.
>
> No idea what that is.
"Backspace" key.
___
Python-De
>> I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of
>> mail reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible
>> (read: fairly easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Eugene> Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii symbols are
Martin> Am 27.03.2011 17:06, schrieb s...@pobox.com:
>> It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
>> challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail
>> reader. (I use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support
>> utf-8 out of the
On 3/27/2011 2:13 PM, Eugene Toder wrote:
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii sy
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:46:35 +0100, Jon Ribbens
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:21:25PM -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
> > > Mind you, I've never managed to get the <-- button working reliably
> > > either, but to be fair that's insanely complicated too.
> >
> > No idea what that is.
>
> "Ba
Trying to compile and install Python 2.7 on irix 6.5.22 IP22 (N32 ABI
model), Using gcc-4.5.1 and binutils 2.20.1. Everything goes well (I
applied th patches listed at:
http://bugs.python.org/file15915/python-2.7-irix.patch )
It compiles and the test mostly work except for the callback ctypes
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> What is "rebase"? Why does everyone want it and hate it at the same time?
It's the same thing that happens when you do a "svn up" with local
changes in your checkout. Logically, your patch gets modified so
that it applies on a different (newer) version of the code.
If
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I'm asking because I don't know hg and git well enough to answer the
> question. In my own use of Bazaar over the last 4+ years, I've almost never
> rebased or even been asked to.
Maybe it depends on what kind of changes you commit. I consider
future maintainers the most i
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:52 PM, raymond.hettinger <
python-check...@python.org> wrote:
> -.. function:: accumulate(iterable)
+.. function:: accumulate(iterable[, func])
>
> Make an iterator that returns accumulated sums. Elements may be any
> addable
> -type including :class:`Decimal`
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
> Is there a good use-case for the func argument? I can only think of bad
> use-cases (where "func" does something that does not remotely resemble
> addition). I fear that people will actually implement these bad use-cases,
> and I will ha
Neil Schemenauer writes:
> Regarding collapsing multiple comments (and rewriting history in
> general), I feel there are two main schools of thought. One school
> considers the development history of a change important and that it
> should be preserved: every step and misstep of development shoul
20 matches
Mail list logo
