On 24/03/2011 00:44, Dj Gilcrease wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
If you guys (or anyone) would like to agree on some precise rules for both
the location of the config file and its contents and express this as a patch
to the PEP text, I have no problem supporting it
Nick Coghlan writes:
> (i.e. less than a minute) because you're going to be running it three
> times in quick succession (perhaps 3 if it applies to 2.7 as well).
Nobody says it's got to be *you* that runs the tests, just that they
need to be run before pushing to public repo.
Here's a simple
On 3/23/2011 9:36 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
That's where the D in DVCS comes in. It's a new world, friends. All
you need to do is bring a $50 wireless router to the sprint, and have
some volunteer set up a shared repo for the sprinters. Then some
volunteer *later* runs the tests and pilo
On 24/03/2011 1:20 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
On 24/03/2011 00:44, Dj Gilcrease wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Mark
Hammond wrote:
If you guys (or anyone) would like to agree on some precise rules for
both
the location of the config file and its contents and express this as
a patch
to th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/03/11 14:53, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> If 'make quicktest' were actually quick - say could run in 1/10 the current
> time, it could be used as a smoke test for merge-dance cases. OTOH, running
> some localized test for the feature or bug you're tryi
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 16:27, Simon Cross wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Antoine Pitrou
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:25:01 -0700
> > Ethan Furman wrote:
> >>
> >> I think the use-case has been lost. Think sprints and multiple push
> >> races. No one is arguing that the smoke
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
