Am 08.01.2011 23:22, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:05:06 +0100
> brett.cannon wrote:
>> +For bugs, an issue needs to:
>> +
>> +* Clearly explain the bug so it can be reproduced
>> +* All relevant platform details are included
>> +* What version(s) of Python are affected by the b
On behalf of the python-mode developers I'm happy to announce the release of
python-mode.el 5.2.0. A summary of the changes since 5.1.0 is included below.
python-mode.el is a major mode for editing Python code in Emacs and XEmacs.
This version has been supported and developed by core Python devel
On 07/01/2011 17:07, Python tracker wrote:
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-12-31 - 2011-01-07)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open2501 (-24)
closed 201
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:53:58 -0500, Andrew Kuchling wrote:
| sendfile() is used when writing really high-performance Web servers,
| in order to save an unnecessary memory-to-memory copy. Question:
| should I make up a patch to add a sendfile() wrapper to Python?
So, was this proposal rejected? If
On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 09:55:19 +0200
max ulidtko wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:53:58 -0500, Andrew Kuchling wrote:
> | sendfile() is used when writing really high-performance Web servers,
> | in order to save an unnecessary memory-to-memory copy. Question:
> | should I make up a patch to add a se
Isn't that just shutil.copyfileobj()?
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:55 PM, max ulidtko wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:53:58 -0500, Andrew Kuchling wrote:
> | sendfile() is used when writing really high-performance Web servers,
> | in order to save an unnecessary memory-to-memory copy. Question:
> |
A strong +1.
Projects such as Twisted would certainly benefit from such an addiction.
I'm not sure the os module is the right place for sendfile() to land though.
Implementation between different platforms tends to vary quite a bit.
A good resource is the samba source code which contains an
impleme
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 11:17:40 -0800
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Isn't that just shutil.copyfileobj()?
copyfileobj() still uses an user-space buffer (the Python bytes
object used in the loop). The advantage of sendfile() is to bypass
user-space logic and do the transfer entirely in kernel. How much
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:20 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> This happened, because of poor bug management, where community doesn't
> play any role in determining which issues are desired.
> This mostly because of limitation of our tracker and desire of people
> to extend it to get damn "stars", mo
Le 07/01/2011 19:39, Brian Curtin a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:14, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> Module split:
>> try to get all issues for 'os' module
> No solution for this right now, but people have suggested that we add
> drop-downs for each module. I'm -0 on that.
I proposed that on
Am 09.01.2011 21:31, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 11:17:40 -0800
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Isn't that just shutil.copyfileobj()?
>
> copyfileobj() still uses an user-space buffer (the Python bytes
> object used in the loop). The advantage of sendfile() is to bypass
> user-spac
> Maybe that could be fixed? Then the remaining feature would be a way
> to sort issue lists by number of nosy people, and to display the
> length of the nosy list.
http://bugs.python.org/iss...@action=search&@columns=title,id,nosy_count&status=1&@sort=-nosy_count
You can create an URL like this
On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:52:47 +0100
Éric Araujo wrote:
> Le 07/01/2011 19:39, Brian Curtin a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:14, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> >> Module split:
> >> try to get all issues for 'os' module
> > No solution for this right now, but people have suggested that we add
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 00:26, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Am 08.01.2011 23:22, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
>> On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:05:06 +0100
>> brett.cannon wrote:
>>> +For bugs, an issue needs to:
>>> +
>>> +* Clearly explain the bug so it can be reproduced
>>> +* All relevant platform details are inc
If you're gonna wrap sendfile, it might be nice to also wrap the splice, tee,
and vmsplice syscalls on linux, since they're a lot more flexible.
Also note that sendfile on BSD has a completely different signature to sendfile
on linux. The BSD one has the rather odd functionality of a built-in wr
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 11:17:40 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| Isn't that just shutil.copyfileobj()?
|
This function has two drawbacks. First, it copies until EOF, and has no
possibility to copy exactly N bytes from source fd (say, opened socket).
This is the reason why I (re)wrote my custom copying
On 9 Jan, 08:09 pm, g.rod...@gmail.com wrote:
A strong +1.
Projects such as Twisted would certainly benefit from such an
addiction.
Eh. There would probably be some benefits, but I don't think they would
be very large in the majority of cases. Also, since adding it to 2.x
would be prohibit
On 1/8/2011 2:55 AM, max ulidtko wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:53:58 -0500, Andrew Kuchling wrote:
| sendfile() is used when writing really high-performance Web servers,
| in order to save an unnecessary memory-to-memory copy. Question:
| should I make up a patch to add a sendfile() wrapper to P
Antoine Pitrou writes:
> A drop-down [list of modules] would be terribly cumbersome.
On the XEmacs tracker, we use a multilink with a checkbox list for the
modules field. This allows you to type in the text field, to check
multiple boxes, and provides input checking. In my typical usage, I
don
19 matches
Mail list logo
