Steven D'Aprano writes:
> I don't think anyone has ever suggested change for change's sake. If
> they have, I'd love to read the PEP for it.
Not to mention the BDFL's pronouncement message!
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mai
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:22 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>>
>> I don't see why such awkward way should be necessary in Python 3k,
>> which breaks backwards compatibility. Why it can't "just work" for my
>> user story?
>
> Because you weren't around advocating and implementing a change when
> Python
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:55:03 +0300
anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
> Is there a public list of annoyances for Python 3 that I can check to
> see if my change is already scheduled for Python 4 and vote for it?
No, there isn't. If you want to know what Python 3 is about, you can :
- read the docs
- rea
Sorry to drop out like that -- I've been having some email issues.
Stephen, great job; thanks for providing that Snow Leopard buildbot.
I think what we're missing now is an Intel Leopard buildbot. 35%
of Mac users are still running Leopard. I'm running it myself on
some machines, due to the NIS
I have appointed Antoine Pitrou as the authority/manager
for which build slave are considered stable. If you want
to get a certain slave elevated or demoted, you have to
convince him.
I would also like to ask release managers to take the
stable list serious: test failures in a stable slave should
> And, of course, we'd like to get some of these Mac buildbots into the
> "stable" category, so that they are consulted for releases. The
> PPC Leopard and x86 Snow Leopard buildbots look like good candidates.
See the message I just sent: you need to convince Antoine, and
he'll arrange it.
Regar
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:55:21 +0200
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I have appointed Antoine Pitrou as the authority/manager
> for which build slave are considered stable. If you want
> to get a certain slave elevated or demoted, you have to
> convince him.
Thank you Martin!
I've added a couple of buil
On 10/13/10 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> (you'll notice that we have currently no 64-bit Windows machine although
> 64-bit support under Windows has specific issues)
Provided its not a problem that its a VM, I have a hefty 64-bit Win7
Professional instance that I can put a buildslave on. Despi
Am 14.10.2010 00:08, schrieb Stephen Hansen:
> On 10/13/10 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> (you'll notice that we have currently no 64-bit Windows machine although
>> 64-bit support under Windows has specific issues)
>
> Provided its not a problem that its a VM, I have a hefty 64-bit Win7
> Prof
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:08:24 -0700
Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On 10/13/10 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > (you'll notice that we have currently no 64-bit Windows machine although
> > 64-bit support under Windows has specific issues)
>
> Provided its not a problem that its a VM, I have a hefty 64-
On 10/13/10 3:14 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 14.10.2010 00:08, schrieb Stephen Hansen:
>> On 10/13/10 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>> (you'll notice that we have currently no 64-bit Windows machine although
>>> 64-bit support under Windows has specific issues)
>>
>> Provided its not a prob
It looks like this response has slipped under my radar. Sorry.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
[skipped description of two alternative solutions]
..
> For all of the reasons you give above, I think it's a bad idea. :-)
>
I did not give any reason for not having access to t
> I'll give it a go; I have all the software needed to run the buildbot on
> it already besides VC Express, which I'm installing now. If ultimately
> it becomes too much of a pain, I'll go back to just providing the mac.
> But, I actually have a vested interest in upgrading our Python to 64-bit
> i
On 10/13/10 3:42 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> I'll give it a go; I have all the software needed to run the buildbot on
>> it already besides VC Express, which I'm installing now. If ultimately
>> it becomes too much of a pain, I'll go back to just providing the mac.
>> But, I actually have a ves
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 17:42, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > I'll give it a go; I have all the software needed to run the buildbot on
> > it already besides VC Express, which I'm installing now. If ultimately
> > it becomes too much of a pain, I'll go back to just providing the mac.
> > But, I act
"Martin v. Löwis" writes:
> Please be aware that Windows poses its own challenges. Often, builds
> or testsuite runs end up with popup windows, which then hang subsequent
> builds. You often get dozens of them to click away. So operating a
> Windows slave is much more tedious than a Unix one.
Fo
-On [20101014 00:55], Brian Curtin (brian.cur...@gmail.com) wrote:
>Correct. There are a few hacky ways to get Express to use the x64 SDK, or so I
>read.
I think Martin meant that you wouldn't need VS Express if you install the
Windows SDK, since it provides all the tools in the SDK to build Pytho
On 10/13/10 10:28 PM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20101014 00:55], Brian Curtin (brian.cur...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Correct. There are a few hacky ways to get Express to use the x64 SDK, or so
>> I
>> read.
>
> I think Martin meant that you wouldn't need VS Express if you install t
Am 13.10.2010 22:55, schrieb "Martin v. Löwis":
> I have appointed Antoine Pitrou as the authority/manager
> for which build slave are considered stable. If you want
> to get a certain slave elevated or demoted, you have to
> convince him.
>
> I would also like to ask release managers to take the
19 matches
Mail list logo
