Benjamin Peterson writes:
> 2010/8/9 Nick Coghlan :
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:10 AM, alexander.belopolsky
> > wrote:
> >> +PS: In the standard Python distribution, this file is encoded
> >> in UTF-8 +and the list is in rough alphabetical order by last
> >> names.
> >>
> >> David Abrah
On 8 Aug, 2010, at 6:15, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Aaargh, I think I've found out what the problem is.
>
> I'm using framework builds on MacOSX. I have two experimental
> builds of Python 3.1 around, plus a standard one installed in
> /Library. It's picking up the version of Python.framework in
> /Lib
2010/8/10 Stephen J. Turnbull :
> Benjamin Peterson writes:
> > 2010/8/9 Nick Coghlan :
> > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:10 AM, alexander.belopolsky
> > > wrote:
> > >> +PS: In the standard Python distribution, this file is encoded
> > >> in UTF-8 +and the list is in rough alphabetical order b
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-08-01 - 2010-08-07)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues stats:
open2640 (+35)
closed 18679 (+194)
total 21319 (+57)
Open issues with patches:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:55:29PM -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 8/9/2010 2:47 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> >> Terry Reedy:
> >
> >> MingW has become less attractive in recent years by the difficulty
> >> in downloading and installing a current version and finding out how to
> >> do so. Some pro
Hi,
lately I've been working on the new summary of Python tracker issues.
This is the result.
On 10/08/2010 16.39, Python tracker wrote:
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-08-01 - 2010-08-07)
This is the period that is considered for the following stats.
By default it shows the activity of the last we
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:28:18 +0300, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
> lately I've been working on the new summary of Python tracker issues.
> This is the result.
Thanks for working on this, Ezio!
> > Issues stats:
> >open2640 (+35)
> >closed 18679 (+194)
> >total 21319 (+57)
>
> T
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:53 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
..
> People need to recognize that any kind of reference is really irrelevant
> here. There is no "right" order that is better than any other "right"
> order. I'd personally object to any English language dictionary telling
> me how my name
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:06 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:55:29PM -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 8/9/2010 2:47 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
>> >> Terry Reedy:
>> >
>> >> MingW has become less attractive in recent years by the difficulty
>> >> in downloading and installing a current v
On 8/10/2010 10:28 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
This is the list of *all* the issues created or reopened during the last
week *that are still open*.
Thank you for removing the duplication of listing issues opened and
closed twice. I otherwise pretty much agree with RDM's comments.
--
Terry Jan R
On 8/10/2010 9:13 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2010/8/10 Stephen J. Turnbull:
Benjamin Peterson writes:
> 2010/8/9 Nick Coghlan:
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:10 AM, alexander.belopolsky
> >wrote:
> >> +PS: In the standard Python distribution, this file is encoded
> >> in U
On 8/10/2010 3:25 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
Everyone working on the English-based Python distribution knows the
order of the 26 English letters. Please use that order (including for
decorated versions and tranliterations) instead of various idiosyncratic
and possibly conflicting nationality-based r
2010/8/10 Terry Reedy :
> On 8/10/2010 9:13 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>
>> 2010/8/10 Stephen J. Turnbull:
>>>
>>> Benjamin Peterson writes:
>>> > 2010/8/9 Nick Coghlan:
>>> > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:10 AM, alexander.belopolsky
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >> +PS: In the standard Python
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
..
> If I were committing a patch and was checking to see whether a name that
> started with a decorated A (or any other letter) were already in the list, I
> would look in the appropriate place in the A (or other) section, not after
> Z.
>
> Eve
On 8/10/2010 3:44 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
No, but if he complains about it, we should change it.
If "In rough English alphabetical order" is extended with "unless the
person requests otherwise", then it should also be extended with "in
which case the name is suffixed with '(phbr)' [or s
> I am not 100% happy with this because I am sure people will keep
> discovering that the order in the file does not match the order
> suggested by their favorite sort program. I was also hoping to learn
> from this discussion what the state of the art in in sorting unicode
> words is. I believe
> If I were committing a patch and was checking to see whether a name that
> started with a decorated A (or any other letter) were already in the
> list, I would look in the appropriate place in the A (or other) section,
> not after Z.
>
> Everyone working on the English-based Python distribution
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:29 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
..
> So where do you put Γεώργιος Μπουτσιούκης?
>
or Александр Белопольский for that matter? :-)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-d
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:29 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> ..
>> So where do you put Γεώργιος Μπουτσιούκης?
>>
>
> or Александр Белопольский for that matter? :-)
James Tauber did a UCA implementation in Python it seems:
http://jtau
Am 11.08.2010 00:35, schrieb Alexander Belopolsky:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:29 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> ..
>> So where do you put Γεώργιος Μπουτσιούκης?
>>
>
> or Александр Белопольский for that matter? :-)
If you care about that, feel free to add that spelling to the file.
Somebody pro
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:50 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
..
>> or Александр Белопольский for that matter? :-)
>
> If you care about that, feel free to add that spelling to the file.
> Somebody proposed to put it along with some latin transliteration,
> which I can sympathize with.
>
That was Dona
Based on a pair of tracker issues (#3445 and #9396) I'm considering a
couple of adjustments to functools.wraps for 3.2.
The first (#3445) is a request from ages ago to make update_wrapper
more forgiving when it encounters a missing attribute. Instead of
throwing AttributeError (as it does now), it
2010/8/10 Nick Coghlan :
> Based on a pair of tracker issues (#3445 and #9396) I'm considering a
> couple of adjustments to functools.wraps for 3.2.
>
> The first (#3445) is a request from ages ago to make update_wrapper
> more forgiving when it encounters a missing attribute. Instead of
> throwing
> The second (#9396) came up in the context of the new cache decorators
> added to functools, and allowing applications to choose their own
> caching strategies. I suggested exposing the original (uncached)
> function, and Raymond suggested that the easiest way to enable that
> would be for functoo
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
>> The second (#9396) came up in the context of the new cache decorators
>> added to functools, and allowing applications to choose their own
>> caching strategies. I suggested exposing the original (uncached)
>> function, and Raymond suggested
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> The second (#9396) came up in the context of the new cache decorators
>> added to functools, and allowing applications to choose their own
>> caching strategies. I suggested exposing the original (uncached)
>> function, and Raymond sugg
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> which would require ignoring the absence of __annotations__.
It turns out the patch that added __annotations__ support also made a
change to make all of the copied attributes optional.
So I'll be tidying up the implementation of that,
On 8/10/2010 10:58 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
>>> The second (#9396) came up in the context of the new cache decorators
>>> added to functools, and allowing applications to choose their own
>>> caching strategies. I suggested exposing the origina
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
> One of the things that's slightly irking about the decorator syntax is
> that a decorator is always called with exactly one argument, and that if
> you want to write a parameterized decorator you therefore end up writing
> a function that retu
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
> One of the things that's slightly irking about the decorator syntax is
> that a decorator is always called with exactly one argument, and that if
> you want to write a parameterized decorator you therefore end up writing
> a function that retu
On 8/10/2010 6:29 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
If I were committing a patch and was checking to see whether a name that
started with a decorated A (or any other letter) were already in the
list, I would look in the appropriate place in the A (or other) section,
not after Z.
Everyone working on
31 matches
Mail list logo
