On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:05:24 am Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Michael Foord
> >
> > wrote:
> >> I'm sure Brett will love this idea, but if it was impossible to
> >> reimport the script being executed as __main__ with
I thought that in order to block a module from being imported, one
would need to assign None to the corresponding entry in sys.modules.
However, it looks like the code in test.support uses 0 instead of
None:
def _save_and_block_module(name, orig_modules):
"""Helper function to save and block a
Fred Drake wrote:
Not when both modules are at the top level; both acceptably provide
the same name. The let's-play-with-it script just wasn't *intended*
to be a module.
I wonder whether this kind of problem would be less prevalent
if the tutorials etc. encouraged naming top-level scripts wit
Antoine Pitrou writes:
> You don't have to receive e-mail from it. Just take a look at the
> archives from time to time after you have done some commits.
> In a threaded view, it's easy to spot the few messages which aren't
> commit notifications, since they are the only one not at the
> top-
On Mon, Jul 12 2010, Bruce Sherwood wrote:
> I don't recall that VIDLE has anything to do with running multiple IDLE
> copies.
Well, I stole the ephemeral port idea from him!
> What's in VIDLE is a lot of bug fixes and some improvements. For
> example, you can configure it to not require having
Neil Hodgson wrote:
> Kurt B. Kaiser:
>
>>> The tear off menus are ugly as well as being non-standard on all three
>>> major platforms.
>> Well, would you discard them? They can (occasionally) be useful.
>
>Yes, I would replace the menus with ones missing the tear line.
> Most of the GUI tool
On Mon, Jul 12 2010, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/12/2010 5:43 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> Am 12.07.2010 23:21, schrieb Terry Reedy:
>>> On 7/12/2010 5:46 AM, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
>>>
On Windows, IDLE opens when you right click / edit a .py. Very useful.
>>>
>>> On my xp machine with 3.1.2,
On 7/11/2010 11:02 PM, Tim Peters wrote:
The heuristic lowered the reported match ratio from .96 to .88, which
would be bad when one wanted the unaltered value.
BTW, it's not clear whether ratio() computes a _useful_ value in the
presence of junk, however that may be defined.
I agree, which
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
..
> and it still requires that '_pickle' is disabled to pass pickle tests.
>
I have found the problem in test_datetime. Restoring sys.modules has
to be done in-place. With this fix, test_datetime looks as follows:
=
import unitte
On Mon, Jul 12 2010, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/12/2010 2:05 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> What I specifically want right now is Commit Authorization Privilege,
>>> especially for IDLE,
>>
>> Not sure who could grant that, but as far as I can: you have it.
>
> If I were approved to commit patche
On 7/12/2010 6:50 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
Am 13.07.2010 00:00, schrieb Terry Reedy:
On 7/12/2010 5:43 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
There should be an "Edit with IDLE" (sic) context menu item.
I agree, and thought about requesting such
You misunderstand.
To the contrary. You misunde
On Mon, Jul 12 2010, Steve Holden wrote:
> I agree, the tear-off menus are an anachronism.
OK, thanks for the input. I use them rarely, myself.
> I'd also like a pony in the form of easily-changeable sets of
> keystroke mappings. I have never found Alt-P and its cousins either
> memorable or c
On 7/12/2010 10:49 PM, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
I've not had experience with patches from Terry. I don't think there are
any in IDLE, at least not acknowledged in NEWS.
You posts in the last day have told me a lot more about you. Let me
introduce myself to you in turn.
I have been involved wi
On 7/11/10 7:31 AM, Tal Einat wrote:
However, I still think IDLE is not currently in a state that it should
be suggested for use by beginners.
Being one of those beginners... here's my $0.02 worth.
IDLE being instantly available on pretty much anything I care to try my
hand at python on... my
I wrote:
> Indeed! And I'd be quite content with such a solution, since I
> consider scripts and modules to be distinct.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Except that modules can often be executed as scripts...
Rest assured, I'm well aware of the history, and don't seriou
Am 13.07.2010 00:48, schrieb Eric Smith:
> On 7/12/2010 6:04 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>> Given how high traffic python-checkins is I don't consider that a
>> reasonable place to send follow-up and nor do I consider it the
>> responsibility of committers to monitor it. As you said earlier this
>> *i
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
