Re: [Python-Dev] [issue1644818] Allow importing built-in submodules

2009-12-19 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> But in my current position and with "I-do-software-developement-too", > you are just pissing me off for not fixing a bug in your program with a 10 > lines long patch written by someone else 3 years ago. Unfortunately, it is not obvious to me that the patch is correct, so I couldn't check it in a

Re: [Python-Dev] [issue1644818] Allow importing built-in submodules

2009-12-19 Thread Julien Danjou
At 1261181806 time_t, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Only if some committer finds time for it, which is *really* scarce. > If you want to push that issue, I promise to review it after you have > reviewed five other patches. Well, that's disapointing. I work on several other free software projects, and

Re: [Python-Dev] Renewal of the 1-for-5 offer (was: [issue1644818] Allow importing built-in submodules)

2009-12-19 Thread R. David Murray
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:16:46 +0100, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?= wrote: > Only if some committer finds time for it, which is *really* scarce. > If you want to push that issue, I promise to review it after you have > reviewed five other patches. As a general note, I'm willing to mak

Re: [Python-Dev] [issue1644818] Allow importing built-in submodules

2009-12-19 Thread Glyph Lefkowitz
On Dec 19, 2009, at 5:29 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Well, that's disapointing. I work on several other free software > projects, and my time is really scarce too. > > I understand blackmailing me to close a bug can be seen as a nice game. > Honestly, if I had more time to get involve in that are

Re: [Python-Dev] [issue1644818] Allow importing built-in submodules

2009-12-19 Thread Nick Coghlan
Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> But in my current position and with "I-do-software-developement-too", >> you are just pissing me off for not fixing a bug in your program with a 10 >> lines long patch written by someone else 3 years ago. > > Unfortunately, it is not obvious to me that the patch is correc

[Python-Dev] Providing support files to assist 3.x extension authors

2009-12-19 Thread Case Vanhorsen
Hello, When I ported gmpy (Python to GMP multiple precision library) to Python 3.x, I began to use PyLong_AsLongAndOverflow frequently. I found the code to slightly faster and cleaner than using PyLong_AsLong and checking for overflow. I looked at making PyLong_AsLongAndOverflow available to Pytho

Re: [Python-Dev] Providing support files to assist 3.x extension authors

2009-12-19 Thread Nick Coghlan
Case Vanhorsen wrote: > Hello, > > When I ported gmpy (Python to GMP multiple precision library) to > Python 3.x, I began to use PyLong_AsLongAndOverflow frequently. I > found the code to slightly faster and cleaner than using PyLong_AsLong > and checking for overflow. I looked at making PyLong_As