I uploaded the patch with choice (a)
http://bugs.python.org/file13215/py3k_mmap_and_bytes.patch
If (b) is suitable, I'll rewrite the patch.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Hi everybody,
PEP 372 was modified so that it provides a simpler API (only the dict API
to be exact) and it was decided to start with a Python-only implementation
and replace it with a C version later if necessary.
Annotated changes from earlier versions of the PEP:
- the extra API for ordered
2009/2/27 Benjamin Peterson :
> 2009/2/27 Nick Coghlan schrieb:
>>
>> I should have a PEP (and implementation) ready for alpha 2 to address
>> the current discrepancy between contextlib.nested and actual nested with
>> statements:
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue5251
>>
>> If you do add a reference
Paul Moore wrote:
> 2009/2/27 Benjamin Peterson :
>> 2009/2/27 Nick Coghlan schrieb:
>>> I should have a PEP (and implementation) ready for alpha 2 to address
>>> the current discrepancy between contextlib.nested and actual nested with
>>> statements:
>>> http://bugs.python.org/issue5251
>>>
>>> I
Running the test suite with Python 2.6.1 32 bit (compiled in DEBUG mode
with Visual Studio Express Edition 2008) on Vista x64, I've got an assert
error:
test_1686475 (__main__.StatAttributeTests) ... Assertion failed:
(__int64)(int)((in / 1000) - secs_between_epochs) == ((in / 1000)
- secs
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 23:04 +0100, Cesare Di Mauro wrote:
> Running the test suite with Python 2.6.1 32 bit (compiled in DEBUG mode
> with Visual Studio Express Edition 2008) on Vista x64, I've got an assert
> error:
>
> test_1686475 (__main__.StatAttributeTests) ... Assertion failed:
> (__int64)(
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:04, Cesare Di Mauro wrote:
> Running the test suite with Python 2.6.1 32 bit (compiled in DEBUG mode
> with Visual Studio Express Edition 2008) on Vista x64, I've got an assert
> error:
>
> test_1686475 (__main__.StatAttributeTests) ... Assertion failed:
> (__int6
2009/3/1 Paul Moore :
>
> Is it worth getting simplegeneric exposed in 3.1
> (http://bugs.python.org/issue5135)? If it's going to be in 2.7, I'd
> like to see it hit 3.1. The patch is against trunk (for 2.7) at the
> moment, I'm not sure what the process would be for forward-porting it
> (do I gene
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:13:27 + (UTC), Armin Ronacher
wrote:
Hi everybody,
PEP 372 was modified so that it provides a simpler API (only the dict API
to be exact) and it was decided to start with a Python-only implementation
and replace it with a C version later if necessary.
Annotated chang
[Armin Ronacher]
PEP 372 was modified so that it provides a simpler API (only the dict API
to be exact) and it was decided to start with a Python-only implementation
and replace it with a C version later if necessary.
Annotated changes from earlier versions of the PEP:
- the extra API for or
10 matches
Mail list logo