Mike Klaas wrote:
Another thing to consider is that the def() pattern is only possible
when the bound variable has no dots. A common pattern for me is to
replace an instances method with a lambda to add monitoring hooks or
disable certain functionality:
inst.get_foo = lambda: FakeFoo()
Go
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This is a reminder that the LAST planned alpha releases of Python 2.6 and
> 3.0 are scheduled for next Wednesday, 07-May-2008. Please be diligent over
> the next week so
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, I would consider the following sufficient:
1) people who have authenticated themselves against the underlying VCS
(i.e.
proj
If you're asking for reasons not to do this:
- AppEngine has a built-in API for dealing with Google Accounts, but
not for OpenID
- Apparently OpenID requires some crypto that would be slow without
additional API support
- I'm not personally familiar with OpenID
None of these seem insurmountable
> This code is now open source! Browse it here:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/source/browse
Are you also going to call it Rietveld then? Sounds better
to me than "the open source code review tool".
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> None of these seem insurmountable, so now that it's open source, I'm
> looking forward to contributions.
Are there any mailing lists associated with this project? I looked at
google code page but couldn't find any.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This code is now open source! Browse it here:
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/source/browse
>
> Are you also going to call it Rietveld then? Sounds better
> to me than "the open source code review tool"
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Raghuram Devarakonda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > None of these seem insurmountable, so now that it's open source, I'm
> > looking forward to contributions.
>
> Are there any mail
> > Are there any mailing lists associated with this project? I looked at
> > google code page but couldn't find any.
>
> Not yet. Do you want me to create a Google group for it?
I think that will be very useful.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-D
Guido> I've been reluctant to use the Rietveld name too much since
Guido> Americans can't spell it. :-) But the open source project *is*
Guido> called Rietveld, so I suppose I should start using that name...
Which reminds me... What's it mean? All I saw was a Dutch city and
(maybe?)
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:32 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Guido> I've been reluctant to use the Rietveld name too much since
> Guido> Americans can't spell it. :-) But the open source project *is*
> Guido> called Rietveld, so I suppose I should start using that name...
>
> Which
Done. I've sent an invite to this list, but just in case it doesn't
make it, here's the group home page:
http://groups.google.com/group/codereview-discuss
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Raghuram Devarakonda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Are there any mailing lists associated with this proj
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This code is now open source! Browse it here:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/source/browse
Are you also going to call it Rietveld then? Sounds better
to me than "the open source
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|I've been reluctant to use the Rietveld name too much since Americans
can't spell it. :-)
Well, it follows the i before e rule, so I think I will manage.
And it is a nice name, unlike Unix 'creat'.
In any case, Ameri
That's a good question. I'll find out.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>
>
> > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > This code is now open source! Browse it here:
> > > >
> >
There is a google code support project where google code issues are tracked.
http://code.google.com/p/support/
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a good question. I'll find out.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTE
I reported this: http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=1006
The tracker is here: http://code.google.com/p/support/issues
Thanks!
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>
>
> > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, "Martin v. Löw
Boris Borcic wrote:
def inst.bar(...) : ...
def fn[k](...) : ...
should be similarly permitted. Has this ever been discussed ?
Yes, but there didn't seem to be much interest in
the idea. Which is disappointing, because it would
be ideal for setting up function tables and such
like.
O
Terry Reedy wrote:
In any case, American programmers are not 'average' Americans ;-).
So I say use it!
Plus, think of all the millions of people who will have
their lives enriched by learning to spell 'Rietveld'
properly!
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mail
19 matches
Mail list logo
