It would be very nice if http://bugs.python.org/issue1692335 fix was included
in 2.5.2. The patch exists, have been tested, reviewed by Georg Brandl, who
says he needs some other developer to review the patches (there is a separate
patch for 2.6). Could please someone look at the issue and help
Perhaps it has to do with the low signal to noise ratio of your
messages...
Nicko
On 31 Jan 2008, at 10:07, Jesus Cea wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
This will be my last email today, I don't want to waste (more of)
your
*valuable* time.
>
>
On 1/31/08, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jesus Cea wrote:
> > My guess is that 2.5 branch is still open to more patches than pure
> > security/stability patches, so "backporting" BerkeleyDB 4.6 support
> > seems reasonable (to me). If I'm wrong, please educate me :-).
>
> I think
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (01/25/08 - 02/01/08)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1680 open (+31) / 12172 closed (+21) / 13852 total (+52)
Open issues with patches: 434
Average durati
On Feb 1, 2008 6:43 AM, Nicko van Someren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps it has to do with the low signal to noise ratio of your
> messages...
That was a little uncalled for. Be polite.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.
Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 6:43 AM, Nicko van Someren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Perhaps it has to do with the low signal to noise ratio of your
>> messages...
>
> That was a little uncalled for. Be polite.
I don't believe it was at all impolite: It was a literal observation of
a
No. The message Jesus added to the tracer was, in its entirety:
"""
Oracle confirms the issue. They will provide a patch.
"""
That's just small, but has a high S/N ratio. The contents of Jesus'
email has nothing to do with this issue.
On Feb 1, 2008 10:37 AM, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1 Feb 2008, at 18:37, Steve Holden wrote:
> Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
>> On Feb 1, 2008 6:43 AM, Nicko van Someren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Perhaps it has to do with the low signal to noise ratio of your
>>> messages...
>>
>> That was a little uncalled for. Be polite.
>
> I don't believe it
A request for information:
What non IEEE 754 platforms exist that people care about running Python 2.6,
Python 3.0 and higher on?
By non IEEE 754 platform, I mean a platform where either the C double is not
the usual 64-bit IEEE floating-point format, or where the C double is IEEE
format but the p
Mark Dickinson wrote:
> At the other end of the spectrum are embedded devices and cellphones. Here
> I have no idea what the situation is at all---any information would be
> valuable.
I know two mobile phone platforms for Python: Nokia S60 and Pippy for
Palm. I haven't had time to study Python on
> What non IEEE 754 platforms exist that people care about running Python
> 2.6, Python 3.0 and higher on?
VMS, that's even supported to some degree in the source tree, and
OS/390 (aka z/OS); patches to support it have been rejected, but
people will likely maintain a fork themselves.
> The major
Mark Dickinson wrote:
> At the other end of the spectrum are embedded devices and cellphones. Here
> I have no idea what the situation is at all---any information would be
> valuable.
I spoke to Mikko Ohtamaa (Moo-- on #pys60) and he gave me the name of a
Nokia developer and this link
http://disc
On Feb 1, 2008 7:56 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mostly. For VAX, there exist two double formats: the D format, and the
> G format - not sure whether you counted them as two.
>
I didn't. Thanks.
> They run Linux, so yes. Notice that other people also run Python on z/OS.
>
On Feb 1, 2008 2:52 PM, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The IBM format is particularly troublesome because
> it's base 16 instead of base 2 (so e.g. multiplying a float by 2 can lose
> bits), but it appears that recent IBM machines do both IBM format and IEEE
> format floating-point.
On Feb 1, 2008 8:04 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I spoke to Mikko Ohtamaa (Moo-- on #pys60) and he gave me the name of a
> Nokia developer and this link
> http://discussion.forum.nokia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=97263. I
> already contacted the developer and asked him to reply
On Feb 1, 2008 6:31 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 2:52 PM, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The IBM format is particularly troublesome because
> > it's base 16 instead of base 2 (so e.g. multiplying a float by 2 can lose
> > bits), but it appears that re
Guido> """
Guido> Oracle confirms the issue. They will provide a patch.
Guido> """
Guido> That's just small, but has a high S/N ratio. The contents of Jesus'
Guido> email has nothing to do with this issue.
As Martin pointed out, small messages tend to get classified as eith
17 matches
Mail list logo
