Sir,
I am a computer science student studying in India. I have maintained a good
academic record throughtout my engineering. I would like to associate myself
with GOOGLE. I will be glad if you let me know how to apply for GOOGLE
INTERSHIP.. given a chance i would prove to be an asset to your
firm.Y
On Nov 21, 2007 6:02 AM, cave girl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sir,
> I am a computer science student studying in India. I have maintained a good
> academic record throughtout my engineering. I would like to associate myself
> with GOOGLE. I will be glad if you let me know how to apply for GOOGLE
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (11/14/07 - 11/21/07)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1328 open (+20) / 11638 closed (+21) / 12966 total (+41)
Open issues with patches: 418
Average durati
Is it only me who thinks that the current daily summaries are a bit
frequent? Would it be possible to reduce the frequency to, say, once a
week?
I can set up a filter to simply ditch the things, but I thought I'd
check what other people's views are before I did.
Paul.
I'm asking a Py3k question on python-dev because I'd like to have
opinions from people who haven't thought about Py3k much yet. Consider
the following example:
class C:
def foo(self): pass
C.foo(42)
This currently fails with this error message:
TypeError: unbound method foo() must b
> Is it only me who thinks that the current daily summaries are a bit
> frequent? Would it be possible to reduce the frequency to, say, once a
> week?
Only if the person in charge of it changes the cron job. Feel free to
submit a bug report at
http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta
(I thou
2007/11/21, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Help in administrating the roundup installation is urgently desired;
> there is currently no active maintenance of this site (which makes me
> wonder whether we should have used Jira instead of roundup, as the
> company offering it had also offe
On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:58 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Is it only me who thinks that the current daily summaries are a bit
> frequent? Would it be possible to reduce the frequency to, say, once a
> week?
>
> I can set up a filter to simply ditch the things, but I thought I'd
> check what other people's v
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm asking a Py3k question on python-dev because I'd like to have
> opinions from people who haven't thought about Py3k much yet. Consider
> the following example:
>
> class C:
> def foo(self): pass
>
> C.foo(42)
>
> This currently fails with this error message:
On 21/11/2007, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is it only me who thinks that the current daily summaries are a bit
> > frequent? Would it be possible to reduce the frequency to, say, once a
> > week?
>
> Only if the person in charge of it changes the cron job. Feel free to
> submit
On Nov 21, 2007 4:33 PM, Michael Foord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I'm asking a Py3k question on python-dev because I'd like to have
> > opinions from people who haven't thought about Py3k much yet. Consider
> > the following example:
> >
> > class C:
> > def fo
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm asking a Py3k question on python-dev because I'd like to have
> opinions from people who haven't thought about Py3k much yet. Consider
> the following example:
>
> class C:
> def foo(self): pass
>
> C.foo(42)
>
> This currently fails with this error message:
If I understand correctly, this would negate the need for staticmethod()
when accessing the function via the class (and not instances) since the
main effect of that is to prevent the wrapping. (And since I consider
instance.somestaticmeth() as even less idiomatic Python that
class.somestaticme
At 01:41 AM 11/22/2007 +0100, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
>Could we check for "real" inheritance first, and call
>__instancecheck__ only when the previous is false? It would speed-up
>the common cases.
+1.
>Or is there really a use case for a derived class to appear as NOT
>being a subclass of it
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> The lookup sequence should probably be something like:
>
>1. type(ob) is cls
>2. issubclass(type(ob), cls)
But can't issubclass be overridden as well?
--
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--+
University of Canterbury,
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Given that the error is of limited value and that otherwise the
> unbound method behaves exactly the same as the original function
> object, I'd like to see if there are strenuous objections against
> dropping unbound method objects altogether (or at least not using them
>
On Nov 21, 2007 4:58 PM, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I understand correctly, this would negate the need for staticmethod()
> when accessing the function via the class (and not instances) since the
> main effect of that is to prevent the wrapping. (And since I consider
> instance.so
At 03:48 PM 11/22/2007 +1300, Greg Ewing wrote:
>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > The lookup sequence should probably be something like:
> >
> >1. type(ob) is cls
> >2. issubclass(type(ob), cls)
>
>But can't issubclass be overridden as well?
Yes, which is why I spelled it that way, and mentioned
On Nov 21, 2007 4:25 PM, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though I'd like to know what happens when I do something like::
>
> >>> class C(object):
> ... def __setitem__(self, key, value):
> ... print key, value
> ...
> >>> c = C()
> >>> dict.update(c,
> Is somewhere the description of these hosts?
Not that I know of; you'll have to ask.
> Are they debian, solaris,
> or what? Which web server do they have? Etc.
They are mostly Debian systems, with Apache, and other debian packages
installed. I don't know what bugs.python.org runs, but I believ
20 matches
Mail list logo
