>> At one time Guido mentioned adding a built-in product() function to
>> cover some of the remaining use cases of the built-in reduce().
Martin> What is the use case for product()?
As I recall, there were basically two uses of reduce(), to sum a series or
(less frequently) to take t
Actually, if you use Google code search, you'll find that multiplying
the numbers in a list doesn't have much use at all. After summing
numbers, joining strings is by far the most common usage -- which is
much better done with the str.join() method.
(PS. I rejected the issue; product() was propose
Hi all,
Has anyone observed missing "email-threads" issue with Roundup bug
tracker email? Any work around for that?
I use mutt and find that roundup bug issue000xx mails are not being threaded.
Its not do with settings, I believe.
The issue000xxx emails might not being have In-Reply-To or
Hi,
I'm looking into porting CPython to native C# (not like IronPython) so
that it can be used in game software on the XBox360: integrated with the
indie development tool XNA Game Studio Express.
I am looking for some guidance on how to approach this in the most
effective way.
I've started by
Ryan Freckleton wrote:
> At one time Guido mentioned adding a built-in product() function to
> cover some of the remaining use cases of the built-in reduce().
Speaking of such things, I was thinking the other day
that it might be useful to have somewhere in the stdlib
a full set of functions for d
> The issue000xxx emails might not being have In-Reply-To or References: header.
If messages are entered through the web interface, they won't have these
headers.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/m
* "Martin v. L?wis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-04 04:21:25]:
> > The issue000xxx emails might not being have In-Reply-To or References:
> > header.
>
> If messages are entered through the web interface, they won't have these
> headers.
Then I should file a bug/feature request for Roundup. How
On 9/3/07, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of such things, I was thinking the other day
> that it might be useful to have somewhere in the stdlib
> a full set of functions for doing elementwise operations
> and reductions on the built-in array type.
>
> This would make it possible
> Then I should file a bug/feature request for Roundup.
Please consider what you are asking for. How precisely should
roundup set the In-reply-to header? It won't know what message
this is a reply to, or whether it is a reply at all.
> How are others keeping track? Whenever I open an issue after
> I've started by looking at the parser portion of the code. However I am
> not certain this is the best place to start. Since there are so many
> ports I assume there is a well trodden path to completing this kind of
> task.
I believe this assumption is wrong. There are not many ports, only
10 matches
Mail list logo
