On 8/15/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Cannon schrieb:
> > On 8/14/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Now that the converted documentation is fairly bug-free, I want to
> >> make the switch.
> >>
> >> I will replace the old Doc/ trees in the trunk and py3k branche
> Okay, I made the switch. I tagged the state of both Python branches
> before the switch as tags/py{26,3k}-before-rstdocs/.
Update instructions:
1. svn diff Doc; any pending changes will need to be redone
2. svn up; this will remove the tex sources, and then likely
fail if there were still o
On 8/15/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Okay, I made the switch. I tagged the state of both Python branches
> > before the switch as tags/py{26,3k}-before-rstdocs/.
>
> Update instructions:
>
> 1. svn diff Doc; any pending changes will need to be redone
> 2. svn up; this will
>> 1. svn diff Doc; any pending changes will need to be redone
>> 2. svn up; this will remove the tex sources, and then likely
>>fail if there were still other files present in Doc, e.g.
>>from building the documentation
>> 3. review any files left in Doc
>> 4. rm -rf Doc
>> 5. svn up
>>
>>
I'd really like an excuse to implement server-side SSL support one of
these days. Could that be a sprint activity? Probably against 2.6 (I
doubt the Modules/_ssl.c file will change much for 3K).
The idea is that if you call socket.ssl() on a socket that's bound to
an address, the socket is assum
Sounds like a good plan. I'm not a great coach though since I didn't
write _ssl.c and I've never used openssl directly. But I can help you
with the Python stuff of course!
--Guido
On 8/15/07, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd really like an excuse to implement server-side SSL support
> Sounds like a good plan. I'm not a great coach though since I didn't
> write _ssl.c and I've never used openssl directly. But I can help you
> with the Python stuff of course!
Thanks (though I think I can handle the Python end of it, too :-).
It's been a while since I wrote any Python C code, t
On 8/15/07, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sounds like a good plan. I'm not a great coach though since I didn't
> > write _ssl.c and I've never used openssl directly. But I can help you
> > with the Python stuff of course!
>
> Thanks (though I think I can handle the Python end of it, t
On Aug 15, 2007, at 9:29 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
> I'd really like an excuse to implement server-side SSL support one of
> these days. Could that be a sprint activity? Probably against 2.6 (I
> doubt the Modules/_ssl.c file will change much for 3K).
>
> The idea is that if you call socket.ssl()
On 8/15/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Georg Brandl schrieb:
> >
> > Neal will change his build scripts, so that the 2.6 and 3.0 devel
> > documentation pages at docs.python.org will be built from these new
> > trees soon.
>
> Okay, I made the switch. I tagged the state of both Pyth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 15, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
> It's been a while since I wrote any Python C code, though -- are there
> better tools these days for debugging reference counting? Anyone
> know?
No, but /that/ would make an awesome sprint topi
Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> On 8/15/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Georg Brandl schrieb:
>> >
>> > Neal will change his build scripts, so that the 2.6 and 3.0 devel
>> > documentation pages at docs.python.org will be built from these new
>> > trees soon.
>>
>> Okay, I made the switch.
12 matches
Mail list logo
