O.R.Senthil Kumaran writes:
> :-) My idea was, a human got to answer it unscrambled as 'fourth' as he
> "understands" what the question is and gives the proper answer.
> Agreed, there could be confusion at first.
But for any given user, there's only going to be a first. Either they
pass the
Time is short and I'm still looking for answers to some questions about
cPython, so that it makes a good showing in the Forrester survey.
1) How is the project governed? How does the community make decisions
on what goes into a release?
You know, I've been a member of the Python community
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:23:46AM -0500, Jeff Rush wrote:
> Time is short and I'm still looking for answers to some questions about
> cPython, so that it makes a good showing in the Forrester survey.
>
[snip]
>
> 4) How many committers to the cPython core are there?
>
>I don't have the nece
While reviewing PEPs, I stumbled over PEP 335 ( Overloadable Boolean
Operators) by Greg Ewing. I am of two minds of this -- on the one
hand, it's been a long time without any working code or anything. OTOH
it might be quite useful to e.g. numpy folks.
It is time to reject it due to lack of interes
With the help of Neal Norwitz, Jeremy Hylton, Alex Martelli and Collin
Winter, I've greatly reduced the set of open PEPs numbered less than
3000. Here's a summary. Please speak up if we've made a grave error; I
take all responsibility for the final decisions.
Positive Decisions (Marked Accepted or
On 5/18/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With the help of Neal Norwitz, Jeremy Hylton, Alex Martelli and Collin
Winter, I've greatly reduced the set of open PEPs numbered less than
3000. Here's a summary. Please speak up if we've made a grave error; I
take all responsibility for t
On 5/18/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/18/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With the help of Neal Norwitz, Jeremy Hylton, Alex Martelli and Collin
> > Winter, I've greatly reduced the set of open PEPs numbered less than
> > 3000. Here's a summary. Please sp
On 5/18/07, Jeff Rush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Time is short and I'm still looking for answers to some questions about
cPython, so that it makes a good showing in the Forrester survey.
1) How is the project governed? How does the community make decisions
on what goes into a release?
Y
Jeff> 1) How is the project governed? How does the community make
Jeff>decisions on what goes into a release?
Jeff>You know, I've been a member of the Python community for many
Jeff>years -- I know about PEPs, Guido as BDFL, and +1/-1. But I've
Jeff>never fig
Brett Cannon schrieb:
> 4) How many committers to the cPython core are there?
>
>I don't have the necessary access to the pydotorg infrastructure
>to answer this -- can someone who does help me out here?
>
>
> According to
> http://www.ohloh.net/projects/26/analyses/latest/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 18, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> SR 354 Enumerations in Python Finney
> Rejected; not enough interest, not sufficiently Pythonic.
I have a competing proposal for enumerations which I just haven't
gotte
Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should be marked final:
SA 358 The "bytes" Object Schemenauer, GvR
SA 3106 Revamping dict.keys(), .values() & .items() GvR
SA 3109 Raising Exceptions in Python 3000Winter
SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in
On 5/18/07, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 18, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > SR 354 Enumerations in Python Finney
> > Rejected; not enough interest, not sufficiently Pythonic.
>
> I have a competing proposal for enumerations which I just
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should be marked final:
>
> SA 358 The "bytes" Object Schemenauer, GvR
> SA 3106 Revamping dict.keys(), .values() & .items() GvR
Not yet -- the implementations of t
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should be marked final:
>
> SA 3109 Raising Exceptions in Python 3000Winter
Not yet implemented, will be this weekend.
> SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 18, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Guido, can you tell me whether the concept of enums for Python is
>> being rejected, or this specific proposal? My proposal would be
>> quite different, and I think, more Pythonic. Should I bot
On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
>
> This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to reflect this). Has a
> decision been made as to whether 2.6 will support both "," and "as" in
> except statements?
I think 'excep
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> While reviewing PEPs, I stumbled over PEP 335 ( Overloadable Boolean
> Operators) by Greg Ewing. I am of two minds of this -- on the one
> hand, it's been a long time without any working code or anything. OTOH
> it might be quite useful to e.g. numpy folks.
This kind of f
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
> >
> > This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to reflect this). Has a
> > decision been made as to whether 2.6 will s
On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
> > >
> > > This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to ref
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| I think it would be better to do content. URLs come to mind; without
| something clickable, most commercial spam would be hamstrung. But
| few bug reports and patches need to contain URLs, except for
| specializ
On 5/18/07, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| I think it would be better to do content. URLs come to mind; without
| something clickable, most commercial spam would be hamstrung. But
| few bug reports and
Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
* New method (proposed by Shane Holloway): s1.isdisjoint(s2). Logically
equivalent to "not s1.intersection(s2)" but has an early-out if a common member
is found. The speed-up is potentially large given two big sets that may
largely overlap or
On 18-May-07, at 6:34 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
>
> * New method (proposed by Shane Holloway): s1.isdisjoint(s2).
> Logically equivalent to "not s1.intersection(s2)" but has an early-
> out if a common member is found. The speed-up is po
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| While reviewing PEPs, I stumbled over PEP 335 ( Overloadable Boolean
| Operators) by Greg Ewing. I am of two minds of this -- on the one
| hand, it's been a long time without any working code or anything. OTOH
| it m
Terry Reedy writes:
> Why not simply embargo any post with an off-site link? Tho there might
> have been some, I can't remember a single example of such at SF.
Fine by me; if it doesn't happen often, then embargoing them would be
fine. My occasional experience with distro reporting processes
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen J.
> Turnbull
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 3:10 AM
> To: python-dev@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Summary of Tracker Issues
>
> O.R.Senthil Kumaran writes:
>
> > :-) My idea w
On Fri, May 18, 2007, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
> Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
>
> * New method (proposed by Shane Holloway): s1.isdisjoint(s2).
> Logically equivalent to "not s1.intersection(s2)" but has an early-out
> if a common member is found. The speed-up is potentiall
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond
> Hettinger
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 8:35 PM
> To: python-dev@python.org
> Subject: [Python-Dev] Py2.6 buildouts to the set API
>
> Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
29 matches
Mail list logo
