Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Even apart from the website that Samuele found, the content sounded
> genuine. Just not something I feel like dealing with (too many
> surveys).
from what I can tell, it was blasted to everyone with a sourceforge
account, which indicates that they're don't really care w
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> Even apart from the website that Samuele found, the content sounded
>> genuine. Just not something I feel like dealing with (too many
>> surveys).
>
> from what I can tell, it was blasted to everyone with a sourceforge
> account, which indicate
I don't have a schedule in mind for 2.5.1 yet, however we should start
preparing for it. The release will probably happen sometime in
January if everyone is available. The branch has been pretty quiet,
so I'm not expecting too many problems.
Once we figure out a date for release I'll follow up h
