Re: [Python-Dev] fpectl: does a better implementation make sense?

Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I spent my last couple of hourse reading several past threads about fpectl. > If > I'm correct > > 1) fpectl is scheduled for deletion in 2.6. > 2) The biggest problem is that the C standard says that it's undefined to > return from a SIGFP

Re: [Python-Dev] Python and the Linux Standard Base (LSB)

Fair enough. Robin On 30/11/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robin Bryce schrieb: > > Yes, especially with the regard to the level you pitch for LSB. I > > would go as far as to say that if this "contract in spirit" is broken > > by vendor repackaging they should: > > * Call th

[Python-Dev] OT: World's oldest ritual discovered. Worshipped the python 70, 000 years ago

http://www.apollon.uio.no/vis/art/2006_4/Artikler/python_english (-: Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmannhttp://phd.pp.ru/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN. ___ Python-Dev mailing list