On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 19:43 -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> >I may be way out of date with the state of the art these days, but in
> >the past, I've had a difficult time making this work for Mailman. For
> >example, at various times we've had to distribute our own email package
> >and Asian codecs
At 11:08 PM 4/20/2006 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>Question out of total ignorance: say I get a 3rd party package that has
>a standard distutils setup.py but knows nothing of setuptools. Say I
>install my own copy of setuptools (or have Python 2.5). Can that 3rd
>party package still be installed "
At 01:18 AM 4/21/2006 +0200, Baptiste Carvello wrote:
>So instead, they ask the setuptool users to use
>python -c "import setuptools; execfile('setup.py')" install
>That's just too bad, and much more confusing than setup.py install_egg !
Actually, the setuptools users just run "easy_install matplo
On Friday 21 April 2006 03:31, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Maybe they know something we don't.
>
> oh, please. it's not like people like myself and MAL don't know
> anything about package distribution...
>
> (why is it that people who *don't* distribute stuff are a lot more
Patch / Bug Summary
___
Patches : 371 open (-12) / 3195 closed (+39) / 3566 total (+27)
Bugs: 908 open (+22) / 5767 closed ( +8) / 6675 total (+30)
RFE : 211 open ( +1) / 212 closed ( +0) / 423 total ( +1)
New / Reopened Patches
__
Fix test_
Thanks for all the great information Phillip.
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 23:33 -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> Anyway, that's a complete digression from the question you asked. As long
> as Mailman doesn't depend on building something like Numeric or Twisted,
> you can probably wrap it in easy_insta
Dennis Heuer wrote:
> Module names
> like hashlib are not python-like too (too c/lowlevel-like).
I agree with Greg: hashlib is a Pythonic name for a module,
just like httplib, mhlib, xmlrpclib, cookielib, contextlib,
difflib, ...
OTOH, it might be indeed that the ctypes name need to be
aligned wi
On 20-apr-2006, at 23:08, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>> As far as I understand the issues they compete up to a point, but
>> should
>> also make it easier to create platform packages that contain
>> proper the
>> proper dependencies because those are part of machine-reada
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
