On 2/21/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Neal> IMO compiler warnings should generate emails from buildbot.
> >
> > It doesn't generate emails for any other condition. I think it should just
> > turn the compilation section yellow.
>
> It would be
Terry Reedy wrote:
> There were perhaps 10
> different proposals, including, I believe, 'outer'. Guido rejected them
> all as having costs greater than the benefits.
As far as I remember, Guido wasn't particularly opposed
to the idea, but the discussion fizzled out after having
failed to reach
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>def incrementer(val):
>def inc():
>.val += 1
>return .val
>return inc
-1, too obscure.
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/
Mark Russell wrote:
> PEP 227 mentions using := as a rebinding operator, but rejects the
> idea as it would encourage the use of closures.
Well, anything that facilitates rebinding in outer scopes
is going to encourage the use of closures, so I can't
see that as being a reason to reject a parti
Just van Rossum wrote:
> Btw, PJE's "crazy" idea (.name, to rebind an outer name) was proposed
> before, but Guido wanted to reserve .name for a (Pascal-like) 'with'
> statement. Hmm,
I guess that doesn't apply any more, since we've already
used "with" for something else.
Regardless, names with
> As far as I remember, Guido wasn't particularly opposed
> to the idea, but the discussion fizzled out after having
> failed to reach a consensus on an obviously right way
> to go about it.
My apologies for bringing this debated topic again to the
front-lines--that said, I think there has been go
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
