Going on with the old bugs checking, here are the results for 2.2.2 (and
one from 2.2.1). When I'll finish this will be put in an informational PEP.
When I verified the bug, I filled two fields:
- Summary: the same subject as in SF
- Group: the bug's group at verifying time.
- Bug #: the bug numb
People:
As the process of deprecating old bugs evolves, the following
categories got empty:
Python 2.1.1
Python 2.1.2
Python 2.2.1
Python 2.2.1 candidate
Python 2.2.2
The SF interface doesn't allow to delete old categories, but maybe we
could ask SF support to do it, as nowad
> As the process of deprecating old bugs evolves, the following
> categories got empty:
>
> Python 2.1.1
> Python 2.1.2
> Python 2.2.1
> Python 2.2.1 candidate
> Python 2.2.2
That's great news.
> The SF interface doesn't allow to delete old categories, but maybe we
> could
Facundo Batista wrote:
> Going on with the old bugs checking, here are the results for 2.2.2 (and
> one from 2.2.1). When I'll finish this will be put in an informational PEP.
>
Great work, Facundo! Now I feel lazy. =)
-Brett
___
Python-Dev mailing l
On 5/30/05, Brett C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Facundo Batista wrote:
> > Going on with the old bugs checking, here are the results for 2.2.2 (and
> > one from 2.2.1). When I'll finish this will be put in an informational PEP.
> >
>
> Great work, Facundo! Now I feel lazy. =)
C'mon! Just a w
On Monday 30 May 2005 17:06, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> There's no harm in having these surface. If the category is accurate,
> let's use it. If the bug is out of date, we can mark it as such and
> close it.
While we can't (and shouldn't) delete categories, we can change the text used
to des
"Fred L. Drake, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Monday 30 May 2005 17:06, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > There's no harm in having these surface. If the category is accurate,
> > let's use it. If the bug is out of date, we can mark it as such and
> > close it.
>
> While we can't (and s
On 5/30/05, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While we can't (and shouldn't) delete categories, we can change the text used
> to describe them. So "Python 2.2.2" can become "Python 2.2.2
> (unmaintained)". Whether this is desirable or not, I'm not sure.
+1 for this solution.
We (
On Monday 30 May 2005 22:46, Josiah Carlson wrote:
> Pain in the rear, but it is a solution to the 'problem' of having 2.1
> and 2.2 groups.
The issue is really that it's not clear that this is a real problem.
Unfortunate, yes, but that's it. Ideally, there'd be a way to say that
certain cat
Facundo Batista wrote:
> On 5/30/05, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>While we can't (and shouldn't) delete categories, we can change the text used
>>to describe them. So "Python 2.2.2" can become "Python 2.2.2
>>(unmaintained)". Whether this is desirable or not, I'm not sure
10 matches
Mail list logo
