Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
just felt a little bored and tried to review a few (no-brainer) patches.
Thanks! They are now all closed.
Please understand that there is a chance that a review posted *only*
to python-dev might get lost/overlooked by the committers, and then
somebody may need to duplicat
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Irmen de Jong wrote:
>
>> I've looked at one bug and a bunch of patches and
>> added a comment to them:
>
>
> Thanks! I have now processed the ones for which I found guidance.
Thank you
> As for the remaining ones:
>
>> [ 756021 ] Allow socket.inet_aton('255.255.255.2
Nick Coghlan writes:
> I'm actually half-tempted to suggest that [map, filter and reduce] should be
> aliased in the functional module for 2.5 (in addition to being in builtins -
ala
> the contents of the exceptions module).
Well, I think it's a good idea, so I'll formally propose it! Let's alias
> Nick Coghlan writes:
> > I'm actually half-tempted to suggest that [map, filter and reduce]
> should be
> > aliased in the functional module for 2.5 (in addition to being in
> builtins -
> ala
> > the contents of the exceptions module).
>
> Well, I think it's a good idea, so I'll formally propos
On Friday 04 March 2005 03:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Update of /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Misc
> In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv6024/Misc
>
> Modified Files:
> Tag: release24-maint
> NEWS
> Log Message:
> SF bug #1155938: Missing None check for __init__(
> > SF bug #1155938: Missing None check for __init__().
>
> Won't this break working (but erroneous) code? If so,
> should it be applied to the 2.4 branch?
Hmm, more than one poster found the error message to be helpful in
detecting buggy code. The non-None return value was a pretty good
indicat
Dear Python Colleague:
I am happy to say that we have now completed the
PyCon DC 2005 keynote speaker lineup, and that the
final keynote will be given by Greg Stein, an
engineering manager wirh Google's Blogger group,
who will be speaking on "Python at Google"
Greg is also known to many in the o
On Friday 04 March 2005 14:35, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Hmm, more than one poster found the error message to be helpful in
> detecting buggy code. The non-None return value was a pretty good
> indicator that the code was doing something other than what the
> programmer intended.
>
> OTOH, there
functioncalls)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A month ago, Nathan Binkert wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be nicer to have a facility that let you send messages
> > between processes and manage concurrency properly instead? You'll
> > need
> > most of this anyway to do multithreading sanely, and the benefit
OK, so this one is really short. Beyond the fact that I am probably doing this
too late at night I also want to give the three people who have stepped forward
to take over for me when I stopped writing the Summaries multiple chances to
pick up on any of the Skipped Threads or even flesh out any
10 matches
Mail list logo
