Re: [Python-Dev] zlib module build failure on Mac OSX 10.4.7

2006-07-06 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On Jul 5, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: On Jul 4, 2006, at 11:21 PM, Neal Norwitz wrote: Ronald, Bob, I know Skip found and fixed his problem, however, is this problem likely to affect other users? Is there anything we can do to help alleviate/diagnose this problem? I'll eithe

Re: [Python-Dev] zlib module build failure on Mac OSX 10.4.7

2006-07-04 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On Jul 4, 2006, at 11:21 PM, Neal Norwitz wrote: Ronald, Bob, I know Skip found and fixed his problem, however, is this problem likely to affect other users? Is there anything we can do to help alleviate/diagnose this problem? I'll either enhance configure or roll back my change to setup.py

Re: [Python-Dev] zlib module build failure on Mac OSX 10.4.7

2006-07-04 Thread Neal Norwitz
Ronald, Bob, I know Skip found and fixed his problem, however, is this problem likely to affect other users? Is there anything we can do to help alleviate/diagnose this problem? n -- On 7/1/06, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 1, 2006, at 8:46 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > >

Re: [Python-Dev] zlib module build failure on Mac OSX 10.4.7

2006-07-01 Thread skip
Ronald> What does /usr/lib/libz.dylib point to on your system? % cd /usr/lib % ls -l libz.* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Feb 12 00:32 libz.1.1.3.dylib -> libz.1.dylib -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 72588 Jun 29 18:36 libz.1.2.3.dylib lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16

Re: [Python-Dev] zlib module build failure on Mac OSX 10.4.7

2006-07-01 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Jul 1, 2006, at 10:45 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On Jul 1, 2006, at 6:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> Ronald> Are you sure you're building on a 10.4 box? Both the >> Ronald> macosx-10.3 thingy and lack of inflateCopy seem to >> indicate that >> Ronald> you're running

Re: [Python-Dev] zlib module build failure on Mac OSX 10.4.7

2006-07-01 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On Jul 1, 2006, at 8:46 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: Ronald Oussoren wrote: What I don't understand yet is why your copy of libz doesn't have inflateCopy. What I don't understand is that configure does not detect that. You may be onto something there. Skip, do you have another copy of lib

Re: [Python-Dev] zlib module build failure on Mac OSX 10.4.7

2006-07-01 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Ronald Oussoren wrote: > What I don't understand yet is why your copy of libz doesn't have > inflateCopy. What I don't understand is that configure does not detect that. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.pyt

Re: [Python-Dev] zlib module build failure on Mac OSX 10.4.7

2006-07-01 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On Jul 1, 2006, at 6:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ronald> Are you sure you're building on a 10.4 box? Both the Ronald> macosx-10.3 thingy and lack of inflateCopy seem to indicate that Ronald> you're running on 10.3. Well, yeah, pretty sure. Let's see. The box with the dis

Re: [Python-Dev] zlib module build failure on Mac OSX 10.4.7

2006-07-01 Thread skip
Ronald> Are you sure you're building on a 10.4 box? Both the Ronald> macosx-10.3 thingy and lack of inflateCopy seem to indicate that Ronald> you're running on 10.3. Well, yeah, pretty sure. Let's see. The box with the disk says "Mac OS X Tiger - Version 10.4" on the spine. The "Ab

Re: [Python-Dev] zlib module build failure on Mac OSX 10.4.7

2006-07-01 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On Jul 1, 2006, at 5:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just upgraded my Mac to OSX 10.4.7 yesterday. svn up'd Python trunk, then "make clean ; configure ; make" and I see that building the zlib module fails: gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -Wno-long-double -no-cpp-precomp -mno- fused-madd -DN

Re: [Python-Dev] zlib module build failure on Mac OSX 10.4.7

2006-06-30 Thread Neal Norwitz
Maybe do a make distclean. There was a problem where old versions of zlib (those without inflateCopy) weren't supported. They are now, but it's a configure check. That coupled with the upgrade and the 10.3 in the pathname, seems like it's just something didn't get cleaned up properly. You could