4. Am I missing a more correct/obvious technique? (There is no need to
support classic classes.)
>>>
>>> Hum, I can't think of one, I'm afraid.
>>>
>>> There has been some vague talk of having a tp_lookup slot in
>>> typeobjects, so
>>>
>>> PyDict_GetItem(t->tp_dict, x);
>>>
>>> would bec
"Phil Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Questions...
>>>
>>> 1. What is the reason why it doesn't go via tp_getattro?
>>
>> Because it wouldn't work if it did? I'm not sure what you're
>> suggesting here.
>
> I'm asking for an explanation for the current implementation. Why wouldn't
> it
> "Phil Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> In PyQt, wrapped types implement lazy access to the type dictionary
>> through tp_getattro. If the normal attribute lookup fails, then private
>> tables are searched and the attribute (if found) is created on the fly
>> and
>> returned. It is also
"Phil Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In PyQt, wrapped types implement lazy access to the type dictionary
> through tp_getattro. If the normal attribute lookup fails, then private
> tables are searched and the attribute (if found) is created on the fly and
> returned. It is also put into t
