Someone should just take down that styleguide, or *replace* it with a
link (and only a link) to PEP 8. I can't do that myself, it's in the
hands of the webmasters.
On 4/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:25:48AM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > I persona
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:25:48AM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I personally think the style guide should just go and/or redirect to
> PEP 8. I didn't even know it existed until this email. And I only
> know of people updated PEP 8.
The top of the style guide basically does that:
This style g
On 4/23/07, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was recently searching for some guidance on how to name packages and
> modules, and discovered an inconsistency in the style guides published at
> www.python.org. http://www.python.org/doc/essays/styleguide.html
> says "Module names can be eith
