Re: [Python-Dev] stable builders

2010-10-05 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:55:41 +0200 "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > > I guess somebody would need to do monitoring on them, and ping operators > if the buildbot is down for an extended period of time. Feel free to > ping any operator whenever you notice that a slave is down (they do get > an automated

Re: [Python-Dev] stable builders

2010-10-05 Thread Martin v. Löwis
To simplify the task of contacting buildbot operators, would it be worth having a "python-buildbot-owners" mailing list? Depends on the traffic. It might spam those owners who are never the target of any of these messages, because they are "well-behaving". Do you really find it difficult to dete

Re: [Python-Dev] stable builders

2010-10-05 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:55 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > I guess somebody would need to do monitoring on them, and ping operators > if the buildbot is down for an extended period of time. Feel free to ping > any operator whenever you notice that a slave is down (they do get > an automated email,

Re: [Python-Dev] stable builders

2010-10-05 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 05.10.10 19:07, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:06:40 +0200 "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: I can probably run a build slave on one of my boxes (Gentoo, Athlon 64 x2). Where are the setup docs? http://wiki.python.org/moin/BuildBot By the way, is the distinction between "stable" a