On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Olemis Lang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> Chris Withers simplistix.co.uk> writes:
>>>
[...]
>
> For instance, I have started something like that has been dome by the
> FLiOOPS project [1]_
Sorry for the missing reference an
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Chris Withers simplistix.co.uk> writes:
>>
>> I'm on on stdlib-sig and I'm afraid I don't have the bandwidth to start
>> on it, but I'd just like to throw in (yet again) that it would be great
>> if the stdlib was actually a set of separate
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Frank Wierzbicki wrote:
>>
>> Talk has started up again on the stdlib-sig list about finding a core
>> stdlib + tests that can be shared by all implementations, potentially
>> living apart from CPython.
>
[...]
>
> if the
> stdlib was actuall
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
This sounds like a bad idea to me. Each Python release is tested and debugged as
a whole. If you have a lot of possible combinations (module A version 1.1 with
module B version 1.2, etc.), it becomes impossible for us to ensure proper QA
for the whole and as a result the qua
Chris Withers simplistix.co.uk> writes:
>
> I'm on on stdlib-sig and I'm afraid I don't have the bandwidth to start
> on it, but I'd just like to throw in (yet again) that it would be great
> if the stdlib was actually a set of separate python packages with their
> own version metadata so that
Frank Wierzbicki wrote:
Talk has started up again on the stdlib-sig list about finding a core
stdlib + tests that can be shared by all implementations, potentially
living apart from CPython. I have volunteered to put together a PEP
on the subject, with Jessie Noller and Brett Canon are helping m
