On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:45:24 +0100
> "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> > It's not really needed; but since it works with 6+ hex digits there might
>> > be false positives.
>>
>> I searched the messages, and it turns out that primarily long number
On 04.03.2011 22:56, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:45:24 +0100
> "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> > It's not really needed; but since it works with 6+ hex digits there might
>> > be false positives.
>>
>> I searched the messages, and it turns out that primarily long numbers
>> would g
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:51:15 -0500
> David Malcolm wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 18:17 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> > On 04.03.2011 13:59, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Does the bug tracker will continue to support rX
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:51:15 -0500
David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 18:17 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
> > On 04.03.2011 13:59, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Does the bug tracker will continue to support rX links after the
> > > migration to Mercurial?
> >
> > Yes.
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:45:24 +0100
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > It's not really needed; but since it works with 6+ hex digits there might
> > be false positives.
>
> I searched the messages, and it turns out that primarily long numbers
> would give false positives:
>
> Python 1.6a2 (#7, Apr 24
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 18:17 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
> On 04.03.2011 13:59, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does the bug tracker will continue to support rX links after the
> > migration to Mercurial?
>
> Yes. They will link to http://hg.python.org/lookup/rX, which uses
> the co
> It's not really needed; but since it works with 6+ hex digits there might
> be false positives.
I searched the messages, and it turns out that primarily long numbers
would give false positives:
Python 1.6a2 (#7, Apr 24 2000, 23:02:54) [GCC pgcc-2.91.66 19990314
minidom (as the proposed docum
On 04.03.2011 18:33, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 04.03.2011 18:17, schrieb Georg Brandl:
>> On 04.03.2011 13:59, Victor Stinner wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does the bug tracker will continue to support rX links after the
>>> migration to Mercurial?
>>
>> Yes. They will link to http://hg.python.
Am 04.03.2011 18:17, schrieb Georg Brandl:
> On 04.03.2011 13:59, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does the bug tracker will continue to support rX links after the
>> migration to Mercurial?
>
> Yes. They will link to http://hg.python.org/lookup/rX, which uses
> the conversion metadata
On 04.03.2011 13:59, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does the bug tracker will continue to support rX links after the
> migration to Mercurial?
Yes. They will link to http://hg.python.org/lookup/rX, which uses
the conversion metadata to find the correct hg revision.
The syntax for chan
We need a mapping for previous commits.
--
anatoly t.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does the bug tracker will continue to support rX links after the
> migration to Mercurial?
>
> Victor
>
> ___
> Python-Dev mailin
11 matches
Mail list logo