>> 1. Have structseq subclass from PyTupleObject so that isinstance(s, tuple)
>> returns True. This makes the object usable whenever
>> tuples are needed.
>
> Hmm, is that really necessary? structseq has been in use for quite a
> while and this need hasn't come up -- it's been designed to be qui
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> FWIW, I was looking into something similar but didn't proceed because it
> would break eval(repr(s)) == s as the constructor signature
> wants all the args in a tuple and won't accept keywords. Still, I think what
> you did is a nice improvement.
I agree that eval(re
On Jan 13, 2008 7:53 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Christian Heimes]
> > Log:
> > Added new an better structseq representation. E.g. repr(time.gmtime(0)) now
> > returns 'time.struct_time(tm_year=1970, tm_mon=1,
> > tm_mday=1, tm_hour=0, tm_min=0, tm_sec=0, tm_wday=3, tm_yday
