[bcc python-dev to move to python-3000]
On 3/22/06, Michael Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > neal.norwitz wrote:
> >
> >> +Outstanding Issues
> >> +==
> >> +
> >> +* Require C99, so we can use // comments, named initializers, dec
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> That would be Donn Cave:
>
> http://bebits.com/app/4232
>
> He's also the one who wrote the Bethon wrapper for the BeOS C++ API.
>
> BTW, the fact that you don't see new checkins doesn't necessarily
> mean that a port is no longer used. It may just be that the existi
On 3/23/06, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> >>> And we still have someone actively interested in maintaining the OS2
> >>> port, it seems.
> >>
> >> Dito for BeOS, now under the name Zeta OS.
> >
> > Who is the one interested in maintaini
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>> And we still have someone actively interested in maintaining the OS2
>>> port, it seems.
>>
>> Dito for BeOS, now under the name Zeta OS.
>
> Who is the one interested in maintaining the BeOS port? the last
> checkins related to BeOS seem to origin
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> And we still have someone actively interested in maintaining the OS2
>> port, it seems.
>
> Dito for BeOS, now under the name Zeta OS.
Who is the one interested in maintaining the BeOS port? the last
checkins related to BeOS seem to originate from the 2001/2002 period.
Re
Michael Hudson wrote:
> "Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> neal.norwitz wrote:
>>
>>> +Outstanding Issues
>>> +==
>>> +
>>> +* Require C99, so we can use // comments, named initializers, declare
>>> variables
>>> + without introducing a new scope, among other benefi
Michael Hudson wrote:
> >> +* Remove support for old systems, including: OS2, BeOS, RISCOS, (SGI)
> >> Irix, Tru64
> >
> > what's old with tru64 ? it's not that uncommon in places where Python
> > has a strong presence, you can still buy AXP hardware throughout 2006,
> > and HP says they'll keep
"Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> neal.norwitz wrote:
>
>> +Outstanding Issues
>> +==
>> +
>> +* Require C99, so we can use // comments, named initializers, declare
>> variables
>> + without introducing a new scope, among other benefits.
>
> gcc only, in other words ?
neal.norwitz wrote:
> +Outstanding Issues
> +==
> +
> +* Require C99, so we can use // comments, named initializers, declare
> variables
> + without introducing a new scope, among other benefits.
gcc only, in other words ?
> +* Remove support for old systems, including: OS2, Be
