On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 20:38, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:25:04 +0100
> Victor Stinner wrote:
> > I see that the PEP is still a draft. What's the status?
>
> PEP 574 is ready for pronouncement. It's waiting for an authority to
> approve it (or decide on a PEP delegate, who I
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:25:04 +0100
Victor Stinner wrote:
> I see that the PEP is still a draft. What's the status?
PEP 574 is ready for pronouncement. It's waiting for an authority to
approve it (or decide on a PEP delegate, who IMHO should probably
be Nick Coghlan).
Regards
Antoine.
>
> D
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 05:26:13 -0500
Wes Turner wrote:
> Thanks! Apache Arrow may also be worth a look:
From PEP 574, "implementation section":
« Support for pickle protocol 5 and out-of-band buffers was added to the
Apache Arrow Python bindings [10]. »
So Arrow is very much in the scope for PEP
Maybe a bit OT: is there a way to *not pickle any callables*?
On Wednesday, January 16, 2019, Wes Turner wrote:
> Thanks! Apache Arrow may also be worth a look:
>
> > Apache Arrow is a cross-language development platform for in-memory
> data. It specifies a standardized language-independent colu
Thanks! Apache Arrow may also be worth a look:
> Apache Arrow is a cross-language development platform for in-memory data.
It specifies a standardized language-independent columnar memory format for
flat and hierarchical data, organized for efficient analytic operations on
modern hardware. It also
I see that the PEP is still a draft. What's the status?
Do you need someone to review your PEP? Do you have anyone in mind who
can review it? I don't feel able to review such PEP, sorry :-(
Victor
Le mer. 16 janv. 2019 à 11:14, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
>
>
> Hello,
>
> For the record, the pickl
