Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
> Hmm, that may not have built correctly, since it isn't showing up in the web
> version of the dev docs yet. I skimmed the diff on python-checkins though, and
> it looked good to me.
I'll keep an eye on the build (built OK on my machine but I'm not sure what the
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Yep, that's what I had assumed you were going to do (this did come up
> > in the big thread about the logging docs, but you may have missed it).
> >
>
> Ok, I've now checked in this change, and would be gr
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 12/13/2010 6:04 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> True, but this area changed after 2.6 was released (after even 2.7, IIRC),
>> so I
>> want to be sure that if I'm going to change the doc sources on
>> release26-maint,
>>
>
> 2.6 is in security-f
On 12/13/2010 6:04 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
True, but this area changed after 2.6 was released (after even 2.7, IIRC), so I
want to be sure that if I'm going to change the doc sources on release26-maint,
2.6 is in security-fix only mode. I am not sure if that precludes doc
fixes, on the chance
Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
> Yep, that's what I had assumed you were going to do (this did come up
> in the big thread about the logging docs, but you may have missed it).
>
Ok, I've now checked in this change, and would be grateful for any feedback.
Time for a break :-)
Thanks a lot for
Tim Golden timgolden.me.uk> writes:
> > It was more a comment on the fact that, at first glance, that sentence
> > looks like an instuction to provide an incorrect link, rather than to
> > provide a link to the section of the docs that is incorrect. Just a
> > quirk of English grammar :)
>
> Th
Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
> Yep, that's what I had assumed you were going to do (this did come up
> in the big thread about the logging docs, but you may have missed it).
I hadn't missed it - I'm just spelling out in more detail what I'm going to do.
> That said, you can't get a one-to-
On 13/12/2010 11:21, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
Tim Golden timgolden.me.uk> writes:
On 13/12/2010 10:31, Vinay Sajip wrote:
[...]
Ideally, link to the wrong doc section on docs.python.org in your bug report.
Now that's not a piece of advice y
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Tim Golden timgolden.me.uk> writes:
>
>>
>> On 13/12/2010 10:31, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>> [...]
>> > Ideally, link to the wrong doc section on docs.python.org in your bug
>> > report.
>>
>> Now that's not a piece of advice you see very often :)
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Vinay is currently working on updates to the logging documentation,
>> and this is one of the things that is likely to change (with the table
>> of attributes moved to the LogRecord section and referenced f
Tim Golden timgolden.me.uk> writes:
>
> On 13/12/2010 10:31, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> [...]
> > Ideally, link to the wrong doc section on docs.python.org in your bug
> > report.
>
> Now that's not a piece of advice you see very often :)
>
True, but this area changed after 2.6 was released (after
Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
> Vinay is currently working on updates to the logging documentation,
> and this is one of the things that is likely to change (with the table
> of attributes moved to the LogRecord section and referenced from the
> sections on Formatter and Filter objects).
Yes,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Please report this on bugs.python.org. Check that you were referring to the
> 2.6
> documentation - I didn't see any references to attributes there (following a
> quick scan). Ideally, link to the wrong doc section on docs.python.org in your
>
On 13/12/2010 10:31, Vinay Sajip wrote:
[...]
Ideally, link to the wrong doc section on docs.python.org in your bug report.
Now that's not a piece of advice you see very often :)
TJG
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.pyth
K. Richard Pixley noir.com> writes:
>
> I'm not sure where to report this but the online doc appears to be
> mismatched to python-2.6.5 for the logging module.
>
> Specifically, for a dir of an instance of a LogRecord, I'm seeing:
>
> ['__doc__', '__init__', '__module__', '__str__', 'args', '
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:20 AM, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> I'm not sure where to report this but the online doc appears to be
> mismatched to python-2.6.5 for the logging module.
>
> Specifically, for a dir of an instance of a LogRecord, I'm seeing:
>
> ['__doc__', '__init__', '__module__', '__st
16 matches
Mail list logo
