On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <
asmo...@in-nomine.org> wrote:
> -On [20090408 05:24], Tennessee Leeuwenburg (tleeuwenb...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
> >It seems like the bug relates only to an older version of a 'weird'
> >operating system and could perhaps be left unfixe
-On [20090408 05:24], Tennessee Leeuwenburg (tleeuwenb...@gmail.com) wrote:
>It seems like the bug relates only to an older version of a 'weird'
>operating system and could perhaps be left unfixed without causing
>anyone any problems.
Being one of the FreeBSD guys I'll throw peanuts at you. :P
I
Tennessee Leeuwenburg writes:
> I'd agree with that. I just wonder whether it's necessary to create another
> issue, or whether the issue can be marked as 'fixed' without opening the new
> issue.
Opening a new issue has the effect of running a poll of those who
watch such issues on the tracker
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
> wrote:
> > This issue has been largely resolved, but there is an outstanding bug
> where
> > the (reviewed and committed) solution does not work on certain versions
> of
> > FreeBSD (
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
wrote:
> This issue has been largely resolved, but there is an outstanding bug where
> the (reviewed and committed) solution does not work on certain versions of
> FreeBSD (broken in 6.3, working in 7+). Do we have a list of 'supported
> platf
