Re: [Python-Dev] gdb support could use some love

2018-04-05 Thread Skip Montanaro
> Modifying GitHub Labels is only available to people with commit privs and, > IIRC, Skip asked to drop his commit privs a few years ago (although I'm sure > we would all be happy to welcome him back!). Alas, then I would feel some obligation to be semi-responsive to buggy things in areas where

Re: [Python-Dev] gdb support could use some love

2018-04-05 Thread Skip Montanaro
> You created the PR from your local python repository master branch. I have > done this, with negative consequences. I believe you will find life with > git easier if you never edit your master branch, or at least, never make > local commits to it, and only commit to and create PRs from special-

Re: [Python-Dev] gdb support could use some love

2018-04-05 Thread Ned Deily
On Apr 5, 2018, at 14:48, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 4/5/2018 5:47 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote: >>> There are a bunch of open issues regarding gdb support including one with a >>> PR in need of review for 3.6+. >> I rejected one (which assumed everyone now uses a python-aware gdb), >> commented on anot

Re: [Python-Dev] gdb support could use some love

2018-04-05 Thread Terry Reedy
On 4/5/2018 5:47 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote: There are a bunch of open issues regarding gdb support including one with a PR in need of review for 3.6+. I rejected one (which assumed everyone now uses a python-aware gdb), commented on another (ceval.c-related name changes in several commands), an

Re: [Python-Dev] gdb support could use some love

2018-04-05 Thread Ned Deily
On Apr 5, 2018, at 12:35, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 at 02:49 Skip Montanaro wrote: >> > There are a bunch of open issues regarding gdb support including one with >> > a PR in need of review for 3.6+. >> >> I rejected one (which assumed everyone now uses a python-aware gdb), >> co

Re: [Python-Dev] gdb support could use some love

2018-04-05 Thread Brett Cannon
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 at 02:49 Skip Montanaro wrote: > > There are a bunch of open issues regarding gdb support including one > with a PR in need of review for 3.6+. > > I rejected one (which assumed everyone now uses a python-aware gdb), > commented on another (ceval.c-related name changes in sever

Re: [Python-Dev] gdb support could use some love

2018-04-05 Thread Skip Montanaro
> There are a bunch of open issues regarding gdb support including one with a > PR in need of review for 3.6+. I rejected one (which assumed everyone now uses a python-aware gdb), commented on another (ceval.c-related name changes in several commands), and created a PR for third (documentation fo