10.03.14 15:09, Nick Coghlan написав(ла):
Huh, I missed that change. Don't we still need U when writing 2/3
compatible code at this point? If so, perhaps we may want to reconsider
this particular deprecation in 3.4.1.
In most cases the 'U' mode either no-op or forbidden in Python 3. It may
be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/10/2014 09:09 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Don't we still need U when writing 2/3 compatible code at this point?
io.TextIOWrapper was already the superior strategy for anyone straddling
Python 2.6+ - Py3k.
Tres.
- --
==