On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:03:36 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
wrote:
> R. David Murray writes:
>
> > again. However, the IPV4 address has a poor reputation, and Verizon
> > at least appears to be blocking it. So more work is still needed.
>
> Don't take Verizon's policy as meaningful. Tell Ver
On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:21:04 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 6 April 2016 at 11:27, Terry Reedy wrote:
> bugs.python.org is currently sending notification emails directly to
> recipients, rather than routing them via the outbound SMTP server on
> mail.python.org.
Correct.
> Reconfiguring it to
On 6 April 2016 at 11:27, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 4/5/2016 3:56 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
>>
>> We think we have a partial (and hopefully temporary) solution to the
>> bugs email blockage: ipv6 has been turned off on bugs, so it is sending
>> only from the ipv4 address. Google appears to be acce
On 4/5/2016 3:56 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
We think we have a partial (and hopefully temporary) solution to the
bugs email blockage: ipv6 has been turned off on bugs, so it is sending
only from the ipv4 address. Google appears to be accepting the emails
again. However, the IPV4 address has a p
